Muhlhausen report is reliable. David is a leading expert on criminal justice programs in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis. Muhlhausen has affirmed often before Congress on the productivity and viability of law requirement grants managed by the U.s. Justice Department. This clearly shows that others, colleagues and ministers appreciate his professionalism. In addition, The Washington Post, The Washington Times and Forbes magazine are among publications that have cited Muhlhausen’s research. His competence is illustrated in his research. He used a lot of source, which are credible. Because, he shows where evidences were taken and wrote who are researchers. Those researchers have special knowledge in this …show more content…
This means that introducing of capital punishment decrease crime even greater than now it is.
Professor Stephan K.Layson’s is an economist because of it, in this research he considered potency as a deterrent of capital punishment with help of statistics and calculation number of crime, which are prevented. If considered publisher by RAVEN, we can see that publisher is credible. Ernest van den Haag is a retired professor of law and Public Policy at Fordham University in New York. Ernest van den Haag is a retired professor of law and Public Policy at Fordham University in New York. This means that he have special knowledge.
But, some people think capital punishment can not deter crime. For instance, According to 99 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 489, criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent.87% of the master criminologists accept that annulment of capital punishment would not have any critical impact on homicide rates (USA, Death penalty information centre). THIS questionnaire give us information that people who works in this area do not believe that capital punishment can deter crime. This clearly shows that capital punishment is not