Data was then collected under an excel sheet, where we transferred our group results individually and also calculated the groups average. The data was entered on an excel sheet into tables and also presented as graphs. The tables represented the percentage of times the participant chose each tone to the corresponding chimera sound. The graphs were a visual representation of the information presented in the tables. There were four tables, two were for tone 2 and two were for tone 4. One table was tone 2 presented as the envelope, and the second was tone 2 presented as the fine structure. The other tables were tone 4 presented as the envelope and tone 4 presented as the fine structure. Consequently, these results varied from each participant in our group of seven members. Once we averaged the data, we had four tables that represented the average selection percentages of our group, and four graphs that expressed the visual representation of the
Data was then collected under an excel sheet, where we transferred our group results individually and also calculated the groups average. The data was entered on an excel sheet into tables and also presented as graphs. The tables represented the percentage of times the participant chose each tone to the corresponding chimera sound. The graphs were a visual representation of the information presented in the tables. There were four tables, two were for tone 2 and two were for tone 4. One table was tone 2 presented as the envelope, and the second was tone 2 presented as the fine structure. The other tables were tone 4 presented as the envelope and tone 4 presented as the fine structure. Consequently, these results varied from each participant in our group of seven members. Once we averaged the data, we had four tables that represented the average selection percentages of our group, and four graphs that expressed the visual representation of the