The trial court denied Riley’s motion, citing the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Diaz, where it was concluded that the Fourth Amendment permits a warrantless search of cellphone data incident to an arrest, if the phone was associated with the arrestee’s person. Riley was eventually charged on all three counts of firing at an occupied vehicle, assault with a firearm, and attempted murder. He was sentenced fifteen years to
The trial court denied Riley’s motion, citing the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Diaz, where it was concluded that the Fourth Amendment permits a warrantless search of cellphone data incident to an arrest, if the phone was associated with the arrestee’s person. Riley was eventually charged on all three counts of firing at an occupied vehicle, assault with a firearm, and attempted murder. He was sentenced fifteen years to