While Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict adherence to the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton believed that the document was meant to bend when something was deemed necessary for the public good. Even though he previously spoke against it, Jefferson bent the rules of the Constitution for things he thought were right, which proves how it is sometimes vital for the government to tasks outside their explicit powers. Without Hamilton’s view on a loose interpretation on the Constitution, there would be no uniform national currency, as it was not stated in the document. Hamilton advocated for the Constitution, but knew that it was something that was not perfect, so when problems arise strict adherence to it was not entirely
While Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict adherence to the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton believed that the document was meant to bend when something was deemed necessary for the public good. Even though he previously spoke against it, Jefferson bent the rules of the Constitution for things he thought were right, which proves how it is sometimes vital for the government to tasks outside their explicit powers. Without Hamilton’s view on a loose interpretation on the Constitution, there would be no uniform national currency, as it was not stated in the document. Hamilton advocated for the Constitution, but knew that it was something that was not perfect, so when problems arise strict adherence to it was not entirely