This paper is mostly about the similarities between societies in the ages.
Side Note: There may not be much dates here, this …show more content…
You would think a country falling apart wouldn’t affect the entire world, but it affected the entire course of world history. Rome was like a parent to Europe. It was instructing Europe about how the world works and it’s also protecting it from the barbarians that are attacking them. So then imagine that parent dying in a tragic accident. That messed up Europe pretty bad. For better or worse, there is only one institution that could replace the empire’s role. The Roman Catholic Church. Which like Rome before it had to become like a government to perform this role and administer the whole of Europe. When the Catholic Church took on the job of being Europe’s “parent”, this marks the beginning of the period we call the Middle …show more content…
But they failed, the Japanese navy was bogged down with naval problems that was being caused by the legendary Korean naval General Yi.
Now to say the Japanese invasion of Korea was a good historical battle is to (like with the Spanish) minimize the death count. So with the previous paragraph, please remember the human beings.
So Japan was like Europe in many ways, 1 they both had a leader that they thought was from God. 2. That leader claimed to rule over all of its affiliated kingdoms and 3. Both leaders had influence over its people to a great extent. (Although one had more actual power than the other). And the Japanese conquests of Korea had a little bit in common with the Spanish invasions. And would you know that is took nearly 2000 years from the start of these societies, until they met. And yet they have so much more in common than what first meets the eye.
So in summary, Europe and Japan were two great civilizations that may have been separated by thousands of Miles, and one may have been more successful at spreading its global influence, but these two civilizations have so much in common but it’s so often discreetly missed that it is almost laughable to the point that most historians miss