Although the town of Seahaven and all its inhabitants are artificially created, Truman’s experiences in Seahaven are not influenced by the presence of the camera on him. He is not acting, as he has no idea that he is being watched by the whole world. Every action Truman takes is how he genuinely reacts when presented with a situation.
Truman’s relationship with his “reality” is carefully orchestrated. Because every action has been planned out, the possibilities for where each situation can go are very limited. In the real world, every decision has a million possible outcomes. In Truman’s world, there is no room for possibility. Truman has no control over his reality, whereas a normal human would be able …show more content…
Those who are confined and not allowed to explore often develop a more intense thirst for adventure. Because Truman was never allowed to explore the possibility of a world outside Seahaven, he is eager to find what lies beyond his known world. Because his world is so carefully orchestrated, it is doubtful that the producers would have made such a simple mistake as giving Truman books that would encourage his adventurous nature. The literature Truman was given likely encouraged the idea of staying in Seahaven.
In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, prisoners are shown only shadows for their entire lives and as such do not consider the possibility of a deeper or more intricate reality existing. The prisoners accept their current situation as normal, as they have never known anything different. Similarly, Truman does not question his reality because he has never known any other life. Christof’s statement reflects the message in Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Truman is like one of the prisoners in the cave and accepts the reality that has been created for …show more content…
After I saw this happen for the first time, I took care to examine all my relationships for any sign of falsehood. This is an ongoing uphill battle, as I never know when someone will betray me.
Christof’s character and dialogue feature existential themes. His statements about the falsity of the outside world and how “we accept the reality with which we are presented” overlap with some of the core concepts of existentialism. Christof brings up an interesting point about how we consider our world to be real because we are content to live in it rather than searching for a deeper reality. This idea is mirrored in several existential principles.
Christof is correct to some extent that the “real” world is full of lies and deceit. However, the real world is also full of genuine relationships, discovery, and truth. A world made only partially of lies is still preferable to a world made completely out of lies. With this statement, Christof falls into a pessimistic school of thinking. He has no hope for the moral sanctity of