Ericsson states “Ignoring the facts may not in and of itself be a form of lying…” (476). In an argument with my friend that was iOS versus Android, I was arguing for Android and won the argument. I told him about all of the features that the operating systemos had that were more powerful and made more bang for your buckrun for your money. I didn’t mention the facts that the iPhone had the best processing power and graphics performance and that iOS is a lot more efficient. Because my friend didn’t know those facts, I won the argument. Not bringing up those facts made the winning argument almost a lie. Sure the other facts were true and made a good stance, but not mentioning the rest of the facts made the final saying not one hundred percent final. Ignoring facts can make a lie in
Ericsson states “Ignoring the facts may not in and of itself be a form of lying…” (476). In an argument with my friend that was iOS versus Android, I was arguing for Android and won the argument. I told him about all of the features that the operating systemos had that were more powerful and made more bang for your buckrun for your money. I didn’t mention the facts that the iPhone had the best processing power and graphics performance and that iOS is a lot more efficient. Because my friend didn’t know those facts, I won the argument. Not bringing up those facts made the winning argument almost a lie. Sure the other facts were true and made a good stance, but not mentioning the rest of the facts made the final saying not one hundred percent final. Ignoring facts can make a lie in