However, the motivations are only half of the story; the people and classes that carry out the revolution are just as important. To align with the Marxist view, the bourgeoisie would be the primary group driving the revolution. Indeed, the actions of the Third Estate through the Tennis Court Oath supports this assertion; those gathered at the Estates General were the best and the brightest of the Third Estate and composed largely of the wealthier commoners who made a living by receiving rents and interests. Additionally, joining the bourgeoisie in their efforts to establish a meritocracy were progressive aristocrats and lower clergy. Therefore, with the presence of upper estates, the actors of the revolution were not a homogenous group, but rather a coalition of those with the same goals of interconnected economic and political reform of abolishing the old regime of feudal privileges. The aristocracy had already begun a decline in its traditional values beginning with the court system of Louis XIV. The class continued to drift away from the foundation of superior bloodline and ownership of land; many nobles were office holders and relied on bureaucratic salaries. In this way, the French Revolution was not exclusively the workings of a uniform …show more content…
The end result of the revolution also deviates from the tradition Marxist view; there was not an idealized destruction of the old regime, but rather a fluid incorporation of the bourgeoisie into the ruling class which was already becoming more capitalist and less founded in old aristocratic values. Similarly, the revisionist explanation is too focused on the political ramifications and eschews the economic motivators of the revolution. The economic causes and resulting restructure of society based on ownership of private property, as well as a meritocracy, incorporate socialist elements into the French Revolution. Thus, by combining the Marxist and revisionist theories, the French Revolution can be understood as a political revolution at the top of society, initially motivated by the need for economic reordering, that had cascading effects that resulted in the redefinition of social