Overall, the subtraction test with gum averaged a score of ninety-seven percent and a time of one minute and fifty-five seconds. The subtraction test without gum averaged a score of ninety-eight percent and a time of two minutes and thirty seconds. The addition test with gum averaged a score of ninety-nine percent and a time of one minute and ten seconds. Without gum, the addition test averaged a score of ninety-seven percent and a time of one minute and seventeen seconds. The multiplication test with gum averaged a score of ninety-six percent and a time of one minute and three seconds. Without gum resulted in an average score of ninety-two percent and a time of one minute and forty-five seconds. Some of the tests increased in time with gum, which refuted my hypothesis, most likely because of a mistake on a problem, that was noticed, went back to, and corrected. This caused extra time to be taken by backtracking to fix the problem, and then going on with completing the test. By looking at the average times and scores for the different non-gum and gum tests, I was able to figure out the subtraction test with gum had a quicker time, but a lower overall
Overall, the subtraction test with gum averaged a score of ninety-seven percent and a time of one minute and fifty-five seconds. The subtraction test without gum averaged a score of ninety-eight percent and a time of two minutes and thirty seconds. The addition test with gum averaged a score of ninety-nine percent and a time of one minute and ten seconds. Without gum, the addition test averaged a score of ninety-seven percent and a time of one minute and seventeen seconds. The multiplication test with gum averaged a score of ninety-six percent and a time of one minute and three seconds. Without gum resulted in an average score of ninety-two percent and a time of one minute and forty-five seconds. Some of the tests increased in time with gum, which refuted my hypothesis, most likely because of a mistake on a problem, that was noticed, went back to, and corrected. This caused extra time to be taken by backtracking to fix the problem, and then going on with completing the test. By looking at the average times and scores for the different non-gum and gum tests, I was able to figure out the subtraction test with gum had a quicker time, but a lower overall