grow, achieve, and surpass God. Listen: this is sad and sometimes confusing; it
is something difficult to understand; how does the man, the proper and perfect
creation of God, wants to create a new world full of beings made with his own
hands? Aren’t we partners in this Kingdom of God? Over the years the
technology has evolved to a point that was previously very difficult to imagine.
Human cloning has long been a yearned objective for geneticists to
achieve. The process of cloning is socially controversial nowadays, as it
involves creating an exact copy of oneself defying the laws of nature in the
process. There are many influences that derive from human …show more content…
The current citizen perceives scientific advances with a certain
ambivalence: while acknowledging as positive the advancement of knowledge
and welfare, it is equally aware that may cause environmental problems, and
threaten important values and beliefs for social cohesion. Frankenstein myth is
just a symbolic representation of the fear that our technological creations
surpass us and master, a systematic idea recent contributions of philosophy and
sociology of science and technology. Insurance that Frankenstein's ghost strolls
around for the mind of more than one, though, unlike in the monster created by
Mary Shelley, in the genetic manipulation new life would be created from alive
preexisting organisms.
The part of Frankenstein relating to the creation of something that can
think by itself had also become a reality. The first time it appears is on middle
minding l nineteenth century. There was a huge debate among all programmers
over the possibility or not that a computer would be able to play chess. In …show more content…
Around 30 years later, when the thinking computer was tagged
impossible, came up with a group of programmers that could make a thinking
program for chess; they decided to work over predictions over each probable
move instead of strategies. That was the birth of programming Frankenstein.
Brito, Matos, Díaz 3
Nowadays, with the same principle, we have up to war computers that are
able to take decisions some times even wiser than humans can do. A proof of
that is the new NSA project, a national defense computer that re programs
herself according to circumstances, in other words, and a computer that can
protect us without the need of a human for at least 100 years.
In conclusion to the theory of evolution, is very unlikely that the
understanding framework will change. This is mostly due to the number of
characters, scientists or any, will surely expand with many new discoveries, and
scientists will surely adjust species names for the development of our