To begin with, MOHO and PEOP have different basic assumption. For MOHO, its basic assumption is a dynamic system theory. Human have input and output in their life, and through the doing dimension of occupation, their behavior will depend …show more content…
It also highlights the relationship between organism and environment. Moreover, PEOP is dynamic and reciprocal which include human throughput between one’s input and output.
Furthermore, components of MOHO and PEOP are different. Firstly, the concept of an individual is different. For MOHO, it sees human as a thinking carrier. MOHO describes the subsystems of a person as volition, which includes personal causation, values and interests, habituation and performance capacity. But for PEOP, according to Baum, C. M. and Christiansen, C. H. (2005), it describes person as the combination of many functional factors, including physiological, cognitive, spiritual, neurobehavioral and psychological (p.246). Secondly, the view of occupational performance is different. MOHO sees the components of one’s occupational performance is step by step, which are skill, performance, participation, occupational identity, occupational competence and occupational adaptation, and it is unidirectional. But for PEOP, the components can affect each other and have interaction. Person as intrinsic factor and environment as extrinsic