The common ground that both arguments stand on is the fact that censorship on its own is just during times of war. On the other hand, one argues that censorship is a must at saving lives, but the other solidly unveils the striping of constitutional rights from man. Whether people agree or disagree with censorship during war, it is evident that censorship must not void the rights of man in order save a few thousand lives. The corruption of censorship within countries can be shown through the voiding of constitutional rights. Although the intentions to use censorship and protect innocent lives is just in times of war, the truth is that modern day censorship is unjust as it leads to infringement of man’s
The common ground that both arguments stand on is the fact that censorship on its own is just during times of war. On the other hand, one argues that censorship is a must at saving lives, but the other solidly unveils the striping of constitutional rights from man. Whether people agree or disagree with censorship during war, it is evident that censorship must not void the rights of man in order save a few thousand lives. The corruption of censorship within countries can be shown through the voiding of constitutional rights. Although the intentions to use censorship and protect innocent lives is just in times of war, the truth is that modern day censorship is unjust as it leads to infringement of man’s