The historical context of the argument is laid out where reference is made to the origins of the “nothing-to-hide” narrative, in the cultural and legal contexts. The policy is analyzed from a point of the risks it poses, the things that could go wrong at once justifying and in one stroke, condemning the practice. In doing this, the value and understanding of privacy are questioned. The extent of what entails privacy is called
The historical context of the argument is laid out where reference is made to the origins of the “nothing-to-hide” narrative, in the cultural and legal contexts. The policy is analyzed from a point of the risks it poses, the things that could go wrong at once justifying and in one stroke, condemning the practice. In doing this, the value and understanding of privacy are questioned. The extent of what entails privacy is called