Federalists feel that the constitution is just fine and the way it is and does not need a bill of rights because the
Federalists feel that the constitution is just fine and the way it is and does not need a bill of rights because the
However, just like these branches balance the U.S., the members of the constitution, or the leaders of the nation, they also needed something to balance them out. The checks and balances system was created in order to keep each and every branch from getting too powerful.…
I am evaluating the extent to which checks and balances has created a limited government. Why should you be for the system of checks and balances and the matter that it creates a limited government? You should be for the system of checks and balances in behalf of the 22nd amendment and the case that each branch of government has their own powers. In document 1 it has showed a graph of the checks and balances. This graph shows that the system of checks and balances is a limited form of government.…
1 The checks and balances system was created to ensure the protection of the individual’s interests and to ensure that the members from each branch would not rely too heavily on other…
The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…
Checks and balances is where each of the 3 branches of government (Judicial, Legislative, and Executive), check on each other, or have power overone another.(Doc C) Each branch of government is able to check on one another and have some power over the other branches. For example, Congress can override a presidential veto, so the present can’t hold too much power. This evidence explains how the Constitution guards against tyranny because the other branches of government can check on it and if needed, exercise their power over said…
The Anti-Federalists are against it and want a stronger state government. They have many fears about Constitution especially since it didn 't have Bill of Rights when it was ratified. One of people against ratifying the Constitution is Patrick Henry who gave speech for it. Henry sees himself as a guardian over rights and liberty. He didn’t get to go to the convention where the Constitution was being made and he saw this as America being in great danger.…
Before the ratification of the Constitution of 1787, the Articles of Confederation gave most of the power to the states. However, the Federalists wanted the national government to hold the majority of the power and not the states. They were in favor of limiting the power of the states. They did not believe a Bill of Rights was necessary because the state constitutions should protect the individual rights. Federalists believed that the best way to protect their rights was through a large republic.…
The Anti-Federalists sought a weak central government that was completely different form Britain’s tyranny, insisted that the Constitution could lead the country to political corruption, and believed that the three branches of government gave too much power to the central government. The Anti-Federalists’ main issue with the Constitution was that it did not discuss personal liberties, such as those described during the enlightenment period. James Madison proposed twelve amendments of which ten were approved. The ten amendments were named the Bill of Rights. The Virginia Declaration of Rights, written by George Mason, influenced the Bill of Rights by promoting the natural rights of the people and that the…
During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united.…
Anti- Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty” (Bill of Rights Institute, "Bill of Rights of the United States of America…
The constitution was signed on September 17,1777. It established laws and showed the basis of how the government would work. The six key principles of the constitution prove that the constitution guards against tyranny in showing how checks and balances, the separation of powers, and popular sovereignty keep things equal and do not give too much power to one small group or person. For starters, checks and balances is the principle that allows national institutions to check each others powers.…
The debate over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution took place by and large between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Prominent Federalist figures included Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams while the prominent Anti-Federalist figures included Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, John Jay, and John Adams. The Federalist supporters consisted of large farmers, merchants and artisans while the Anti-Federalist supporters consisted of small farmers, mainly from rural areas. There were many issues that divided the two positions. One issue involved the Anti-Federalist farmers’ position against the establishment “of a new national currency” for fear that it would “lower prices for their commodities or enable the very wealthy to buy up their land” (26).…
How Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? How do you think the Constitution guards against tyranny? Do you think it was difficult to frame a government to guard against one specific problem? In the year 1787 in Philadelphia a group of men were faced with the task of writing a new Constitution for America, but this task proved to be difficult.…
Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…
The Federalists believed that the Constitution covered the natural rights given to a citizen, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the creation of a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the individual rights of the…