Documents such as the Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution set precedents for legislation that the United States and countries around the world would follow in attempts to establish effective and efficient governments. The U.S. Constitution served as inspiration and a template for progress toward constitutionalism and democracy(AEI). The French Revolution and the decolonization of Southeast Asian countries led to the adoption of constitutions that mirrored that of the United states “whether consciously or unconsciously,” and these countries “adopted many important concepts from the U.S. constitution such as: the separation of powers into three branches of government, the principle of federalism, and the supremacy of the constitution.” (La) However, simply the presence and importance of change that occurred does not justify the use of the term revolution. The changes would have to be sudden, extreme, or complete in order to fulfill the definition of revolution which I argue against in the remaining …show more content…
Just because the colonists fought for their independence between 1775 and 1783 does not prove a revolution took place. In fact, the very act of a war provides more evidence of an insurrection rather than a revolution according to the ideas of philosopher Max Stirner. In The Ego and Its Own, Stirner writes, “Revolution and insurrection must not be looked upon as synonymous. The former consists in an overturning of conditions…a political or social act.” He claims insurrection “is not a fight against the established, since, if it prospers, the established collapses of itself; it is only a working forth of me out of the established” (Stirner). The colonists uprising was not done with the intentions of wholly reforming their social or political systems. Verily, the radicals perpetuating the idea of independence or the later ratification or the constitution were unsure of their ultimate goal and most “respected authorities” believed a republican government could not be successfully established (Ellis). However, they simply desired relief from Parliamentary Taxation without representation.
The American Revolution was not a revolution because it lacked components essential to the root of the word: immediacy, wholeness, and in many aspects, large degrees of change. The misconception that a war defines a revolution is refuted not only by definition, but by the philosophies