According to Milton-Edwards the actions of secular leaders in the 20th century contribute significantly to formation of terror groups. This is true, as to the members of IS, the Middle Eastern states of the 20th represent years of Muslim repression and the bastardization of Islam, and act as a call to arms. In the article they call the dictators of these groups tawaghit, which means one who has crossed the limits or rebels. It signifies people …show more content…
This is because IS was just a recent evolution of radical terrorism in the Middle East and the factors that led to the founding of IS are not unique and thus most commentary that applied to Al-Qaeda or the Afghan Mujahidin easily fits the IS dialogue. The lack of stable government to ensure Justice, past violations on the part of secularists, bleak economic prospects, the desire to establish religious law and others are elaborated on heavily within Beverly