However, Sunita does experience severe withdrawal symptoms which had the potential to endanger her life. So, could it be argued that Barbara taking away her drugs was with the ulterior intent to cause her grievous bodily harm? As, Barbara’s act was a substantial cause of Sunita’s injuries. It may be argued that there is no ulterior intent to cause grievous bodily harm because she does call an ambulance after taking pity on Sunita. The act of calling an ambulance could show that Barbara did not intend to cause serious harm to Sunita, only to cause pain and discomfort. As a result, Barbara may not be liable under section
However, Sunita does experience severe withdrawal symptoms which had the potential to endanger her life. So, could it be argued that Barbara taking away her drugs was with the ulterior intent to cause her grievous bodily harm? As, Barbara’s act was a substantial cause of Sunita’s injuries. It may be argued that there is no ulterior intent to cause grievous bodily harm because she does call an ambulance after taking pity on Sunita. The act of calling an ambulance could show that Barbara did not intend to cause serious harm to Sunita, only to cause pain and discomfort. As a result, Barbara may not be liable under section