They point that it is unnecessary to form a strong-willed soul through hardships when that individual could just be created like that in the first place. What this argument lacks is the true aspects of this form of society. Not only would progress be completely inhibited through the lack of struggle in the world, but the ability of free will would be non-existent. Divine control would be binding to society to the extent that there would be no purpose of it, completely defying what instructions on following God’s will imply. Without the choice to overcome temptation, man cannot legitimately flourish as a follower of God. Free will is both a gift and test given from God, and it is dependent on society to utilize it for the correct purpose. Many people do not act on it in such a way, but divine intervention towards such actions would disrupt the purpose of free
They point that it is unnecessary to form a strong-willed soul through hardships when that individual could just be created like that in the first place. What this argument lacks is the true aspects of this form of society. Not only would progress be completely inhibited through the lack of struggle in the world, but the ability of free will would be non-existent. Divine control would be binding to society to the extent that there would be no purpose of it, completely defying what instructions on following God’s will imply. Without the choice to overcome temptation, man cannot legitimately flourish as a follower of God. Free will is both a gift and test given from God, and it is dependent on society to utilize it for the correct purpose. Many people do not act on it in such a way, but divine intervention towards such actions would disrupt the purpose of free