Schneider believes that existential- humanistic psychology is “broad band” whereas other methods theories and aspirations are identified as “narrower band”. The narrower band psychology focused on individual relationship and a connection of their physiology, actions and cognition, however the neglect to looking at the full experience of living. He also goes into detail about there isn’t a theory, method, or practice that actually constituents the fuller experience of living with confidence (Schneider, 2014). The existential-humanistic psychology aims to comprehend one’s relation in congruence with physical body, and behaviors (Schneider, 2014). It also focus on relationship existence as a whole, which this constitutes a greater influence than measureable variables. There have be increase concern that individuals in the field are focused on quantative-experimental research of positive psychology, with the qualitative experimental realities of life which is more vast and in depth elements that are not being taken in consideration (Schneider, 2011). It seem redundant to believed that segregating existential humanistic from positive psychology due to traditional purpose were to avoid including qualitative and quantitative data, due complexity of “well-being”. Schneider (2014), believes there must be way for positive psychology and existential humanistic researchers to be able to work …show more content…
He states that due to the wide views of the two perspective its best that perspectives are shared separately, but share the desire to comprehend individual’s potential and well beings (Waterman, 2013). Also he believe if there is mutual benefits, but to also to be able to identify the differences in depth that respective research with “few recriminations” should be taken into consideration (Waterman, 2013). This is not conclude that positive psychologist and humanistic should not do collaborative work, but concerns of both fields should not be override, this is where the philosophical divide is.
Waterman (2014) discussed the realm of religion in regards of humanistic psychology in regards of Jews and Christian with having common goal. Yet even though they have common goals the two religious perspectives had different views in regards of Jesus was the Messiah or if individuals who are not baptized will enter Heaven (Waterman, 2013). He utilized these religions due to their similarities and theological significance they are still different in their foundation, and concludes why the religions were never