It is clear that European citizens from the sixteenth century appreciated executions as a sign of authority from their rulers and to observe fairness take …show more content…
Schmidt’s goal during his lifetime and probably the reason to write his journal was to earn his status as an honorable man. Instead, executioners, like him, were viewed with disgust and society “remained wary of inviting them and their family members into their homes.” (Harrington, CHPT. 1) Most importantly, the mentality during the sixteenth century was “anyone who touched an execution structure risked lifelong pollution and back luck.” (Harrington, CHPT. 3) This statement explains the society’s behavior based on the idea that the only time that one should be touched by these men were because the subject did a wrongdoing and was being punished, but if the individual lived an honorable and virtuous life, then there should not be a reason to interact with Schmidt, for instance. Also, such society were “reputation was most valuable” made sure to not act in any way that would be seen as despicable or shameful, even if it is only having a conversation with executioners. (Harrington, CHPT.