Now in Broken City, there are many opinions about the reasons to watch this film. When we talk about camera movement in this film, we notice that it is a big part of the visual aspect in the production process. Can that be the only reason for people to watch the film? Is it a game changer for the audience? The problem with camera movement in this film is that in some of the places, it is over-used whether it is essential or not. An example in the film can be when Wahlberg was waiting for Catherine Zeta-Jones’s character to go to the man who she was supposedly sleeping with. Apart from the stable, fixed shots, the movements included were handheld camera movements and point-of-view shots. It made sense when the handheld point of view shot was used to give the point of view of Wahlberg’s character. What was a bit useless in my opinion was when the camera was behind Wahlberg and it was filming Catherine’s character as she walked towards the house. This shot was
Now in Broken City, there are many opinions about the reasons to watch this film. When we talk about camera movement in this film, we notice that it is a big part of the visual aspect in the production process. Can that be the only reason for people to watch the film? Is it a game changer for the audience? The problem with camera movement in this film is that in some of the places, it is over-used whether it is essential or not. An example in the film can be when Wahlberg was waiting for Catherine Zeta-Jones’s character to go to the man who she was supposedly sleeping with. Apart from the stable, fixed shots, the movements included were handheld camera movements and point-of-view shots. It made sense when the handheld point of view shot was used to give the point of view of Wahlberg’s character. What was a bit useless in my opinion was when the camera was behind Wahlberg and it was filming Catherine’s character as she walked towards the house. This shot was