- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
111 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
peripheral aud system
|
external and middle ear, cochlear, 8th nerve
|
|
who is ABR most useful in for perish assessment
|
infants and older children who are diff to test w/ behavioral aud
|
|
is ABR ever a valid measure of hearing
|
no b/c of underlying neuroanatomic and neurophysioloci bases=supplement with other tests
|
|
low fq sensory HL
|
click=normal ABR and LI functions
(others showed shorter wave V latencies and slight decrease in I-V) |
|
mid and high fq SNHL
|
wave V latency increases as HL at 4 KHZ increases
|
|
characteristic for finding conductive losses
|
delay in wave I latency and horizontal shift in wave V latency corresponding to the amount of air-bone bone gap
|
|
sensory losses
|
steeper than normal LI function, see minimal latency increase in wave V at high stim intensity levels, despite mod-server SNHL
|
|
what happens at low intensity levels for sensory losses
|
wave I disappears b/c only more apical regions of cochlea are activated
|
|
otitis media
|
can use ABR to estimate amy of conductive HL for otitis media w/ effusion-wave I ann latency best indicator
|
|
otosclerosis
|
genetic disease of bone around cochlea
-could use air and bone conducted in ABR w/ severe conductive HL b/c they have make a masking dilemma |
|
severe to profound cochlear pathologies
|
usually don't see ABR
|
|
mod high fq SNHL
|
wave V LI=steeper than nml, don't see wave V at lower intensity levels
|
|
Meniere's endolymphatic hydrops
|
when 1st considered config is better hearing about 1000 Hz thus usually well formed ABR will change as HL is present
|
|
presbycusis
|
Wave V latency delay of about .6-.6 ms
-delay usually greater in males -wave I/V interval increases with age |
|
noise induced SNHL
|
increase in absolute latency of I, III, V
prolonged interwave at higher stim rates |
|
in general aud nerve and/ or brainstem disorders
|
latency of V prolonged at all intensities
-Wave V L-I may be indistinugatiable from a conductive |
|
how can you distinguish conductive from retrocochlear
|
comparing latencies of earlier peaks of ABR
in conductive HL all waves will be offset by equal amounts vs. in retro earlier peaks may be w/in nml limits or if there is perish HL delayed by lesser amount than the later components (prolonged interweave) |
|
misconceptions about tone ABR
|
1. tone ABR thresholds are not similar to behavioral thresholds
2. ABR to 500 Hz tones are poor predictors of low fq behavior thresholds 3. waveform identification of ABR to 500 Hz is difficult |
|
who is it not true that ABR thresholds are NOT similar to behavioral thresholds
|
1. not true b/c: w/normal hearing listeners, tone-evoked ABR thresholds are typically 10-20 dBnHL
2. those w/SNHL are typically 5 to 15 dB higher than pure tone behav thresholds for adults & from 10 dB lower to 10 dB higher than pure tone behav thresh in infants & young children 3. Recently, high correlations (i.e., = 0.94) have been demonstrated between ABR thresholds to 500-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz air-conducted tones in notched noise and the pure-tone behavioral thresholds for these frequencies for infants and young children (N=88) with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss 4. Regression line slopes were close to 1.0, indicating nearly a one-to-one correspondence between increases in pure-tone behavioral threshold and increases in ABR threshold. [Stapells, Gravel & Martin, Ear & Hearing, 1995] |
|
why is it not true that ABR to 500 Hz tones are poor predictors of behavioral thresholds
|
1. not true b/c data has indicated that ABR to 500 Hz brief tones DOES provide an acceptably accurate assessment of pure tone behav thresh
|
|
3 methods for fq specific ABR
|
1. mask fq regions not intented to be part of stim (high pass noise/noise/notch in region desired/masking with a pure tone)
2. response to stim @ specific fq or w/ a defined fq region is served from 2 other responses (derive response method) 3. use a tonal stim w/ careful onset characteristics |
|
stimulus duration of tone ABR
|
sum of rise, plateau, fall
ex. 2-1-2 -time changes with fq |
|
filter settings of tone abr
|
important to use high pass filter setting of 20-30 Hz to avoid eliminating a sig amount of response
|
|
analysis time of tone ABR
|
25 ms needed to incorporate increased latencies seen w/ decreasing stim intensity, HL, brainstem and infant path
|
|
stim rate of tone ABR
|
39.1/s for tones, could go up faster to 61 but not with a 25 ms analysis time
|
|
morphology of tone ABR
|
-consists primaily of V and negativity V'
-typc don't see I-IV at low-mod intensities or high intensity -resposnes to tones occurs later than clicks - |
|
latency of tone ABR
|
-low fq tones are later than those in response to higher fq tones presented at same intensities
-reflect cochlear travel time |
|
most powerful neurodiagnsositic application of ABR
|
early identification of tumors w/in posterior fossa involving 8th cranial nerve
|
|
how sensitive/specificiity is ABR
|
not 100%
|
|
annual incidence of 8th cranial nerve
|
4.5-12/100,000 in US=~1%
|
|
intracranial neoplasms (list)
|
medulloblastomas
astrocytomas cranipharyngiomas ependymommas pinelamos gliomas meningiomas |
|
general location of tumors for adults
|
70% fd in supratentrial compartment of brain (above tentorium and posterior fossa) for adults
|
|
general location of tumors for children
|
70% fd in infratentorial (w/in posterior fossa) for children
|
|
impact of tumors depends n
|
invasiveness, size, location and rate of growth
|
|
subjective aud complaints in its with brain tumors
|
rarely
|
|
8th nerve tumors types (list)
|
shwannomas
neurofibromas meningiomas |
|
shwannomas
|
• Most common of 8th nerve tumors
• 80% of cerebellopontine angle neoplasms = Schwannomas (occurrence = 5-10% of tumors) • schwannomas occur in females more than males (age range = 35-60 yrs) • schwannomas of 8th nerve = usually benign – arise from a focal point w/in nerve trunk of peripheral portion of vestibular branch, tumor expands, tumor = encapsulated mass projecting from side of nerve [figure 12-1 Hall] • grows toward CP angle, they can grow to be rather large (4-5 cm) • usually grow slowly & can spontaneously stop growing • most common complaint = hearing loss (also can report headache, dizziness/imbalance, unsteady gait, tinnitus) |
|
neurofibromas
|
• Disease = neurofibromatosis (von Recklinghausen’s)
• Has a peripheral form (NF1) or central form (NF2) • Genetically transferable & autosomal dominant • NF1 = more common than NF2, either can be bilateral (NF2 is more often bilateral than NF1) • NF1 occurs in 1st decade of life vs. NF2 in 2nd or 3rd decade • 8th nerve tumors fd in 5% of NF1 patients & in over 95% w/NF2 • in both types, tumors arise from Schwann cells – NF1 is similar to Schwannomas, just discussed – displace nerves vs. NF2 – engulf nerves, also NF2 tumors are not encapsulated • usually see HL in over 90% of patients w/neurofibromatosis • disease has progressive disabling & disfiguring course |
|
meningiomas
|
• Originates from meningothelial arachnoid cells & often fd attached to dura
• Slow growing • >90% fd in supratentorial compartment, >67% fd in anterior ½ of cranium • if involve 8th nerve, difficult to distinguish from Schwannomas • almost always fd singly, may produce subtle audiometric signs, but ABR findings are unequivocally abn • [figure 12-2 Hall] |
|
diagnostic paratmeter w/ ABR for tumors
|
interwave latency
|
|
how many surgically confide tumors cab be identified with ABR abnormalities
|
over 90%
|
|
normal vs. abnormal latency criteria for retrocochlear
|
1. Abs latency of wave V exceeds clinical definition of nml limits
• 2. abnormal interear or interaural latency diff for wave V – wave V latency for one ear vs other (value greater than 0.2-0.4 msec) • 3. wave I-V latency = abn prolonged relative to norms, can also look at I-III & III-V [figure 12-3 Hall] • 4. abn interaural latency diff for I-V (also maybe for I-III, III-V) – looking between the ears |
|
problem with ABR retrococlear
|
often hard to identify individ wave components making latency calculations difficult
|
|
wave V interaural latency difference
|
-use pt as their own control
-ensure same stim -usually greater than .3-.4 msec off from normal between ears |
|
important consideration for likelihood of wave V presence vs. absence
|
degree of HL in 1-4 kHz region
|
|
general rule for size of tumors
|
its with large tumors will have no recordable ABR vs its with small tumors
|
|
contralateral effects of 8th nerve tumors
|
• 1. ABR interpretation of contralateral effects must be differentiated from abnormalities due to bilateral tumors or if waves I or III are not clearly recorded to other serious hearing impairment
• 2. ABR recordings from contralateral ear may provide diagnostically useful info on tumor size & functional effects, even though degree of hearing deficit on involved ear precludes meaningful ABR recording |
|
how can a tumor interfere with generation of ABR?
|
1. compression or stretching of 8th nerve fibers by expanding tumor mass resulting in desynchronization of 8th nerve fibers or increased resistance in nerve conduction velocity
• 2. Compromised blood supply to 8th nerve & cochlea |
|
when do you use stacked ABR
|
• Procedure for detecting tumors smaller than 1 cm, which often go undetected by standard clinical ABR methodology
|
|
what is the stacked ABR technique
|
• Derived narrowband ABR technique consists of simultaneous ipsi presentation of broadband click & high pass filtered noise
|
|
how does this stacked ABR technique work?
|
• Portion of cochlea masked by high pass noise does not contribute to ABR
• Cutoff freq of high pass noise lowered successively from one run to next • Narrowband contributions from cochlea are then derived by successive subtraction of responses to successive high pass noise masking conditions [figure 2 Don] • [figure 3 Don] wave V latencies are longer for each successive (lower center freq) derived ABR – reflect cochlear response time composed of apparent TW delay & freq dependent synchronization time |
|
what does the stacked ABR method do?
|
= minimize cochlear response time on amp measures, amp of wave V in unmasked response varies depending on wave V time delay between derived bands that compose unmasked response, variations in delay alter degree of synchrony of activity betw diff regions of cochlea which in turn affects amp of wave V
• stacked ABR created by time shifting derived band waveforms so peak latencies of wave V in each derived band coincide & add these together |
|
list of CNS abnormalities
|
neopalsms and tumors
demyelinatig diseases f |
|
neoplasms and tumors
|
brainstem glioma
• Most often found in children or adolescents • ~ ¾ of brainstem tumors in children = gliomas • grow slowly & are highly invasive – thus total surgical removal often not possible & recurrence is often likely • ABR abnormalities are consistently recorded in children w/pontine brainstem gliomas |
|
dysmelinating
|
= disease process causes defective myelin metabolism
|
|
most common dymelinating diseases
|
MS
|
|
MS
|
• Onset betw 20-40 yrs (50-70% patients)
• MS rare in children • Male:female ratio = 1:1.7 • More prevalent in colder climates (don’t know why) • Disease has slow progressive course that is irregular – fluctuating periods of exacerbation & remission of specific symptoms |
|
what do you look for in MS
|
plaques: large, irregular, discontinous lesions, in CNS on myelin sheaths
|
|
what are the symptoms of MS
|
= sensory & motor deficits in head, limbs, trunk; sphincter disturbances; visual (common), tactile, & hearing (less common) deficits
|
|
ABR findings of MS
|
prolonged interwave latencies (I-III, III-V, I-V); dec amp –esp wave V; poor morphology (desynchronization) for later wave components; poor test repeatability; total absence of one or more recognizable wave components after wave I or II – most often wave V; occasional absence or prolongation of wave I; most characteristic finding = inc ABR latency esp for wave V
|
|
Schilder disease
|
• Progressive childhood disease, usually have bilateral, large, continuous patches of demyelination & associated severe axonal damage
• Also known as diffuse cerebral sclerosis • Some consider this childhood MS • Diagnosis made by CT scan & CSF exam • Symptoms = irreversible, progressive loss of intellectual functions, cortical blindness, bilateral spastic paresis, & deafness – death in 1-5 years |
|
leukodystrophies
|
rare familial abnormalities or myelination formation, found in infants & children & affect white matter
|
|
leukodystrophies ABR findings
|
prolonged interwave I-V latency, absence of wave III or V, or all components after waves I & II, wave I usually present but ABR is rarely nml
|
|
ABR at birth
|
• ABR waveforms are incomplete at birth
• Generally only 3 major components seen (I, III, V) • Interwave latency values are initially prolonged (I-III, III-V, I-V) • E.g. I-V at term birth = ~5.00 msec vs. what for an adult?? (4 msec) |
|
wave I at birth
|
may be more prominent than other waves at this time b.c peripheral and system matures before the CNS does
|
|
ABR at _____ fq stimuli are more impt for generating ABR in newborns than adults
|
low
|
|
gender effect on ABR
|
females show shorter latency values and larger amplitudes vs males for later wave (III+)=females have shorter interwave latencies
|
|
age effect on ABR
|
latency increases over range of 25-55 years on the order of .2 msec
|
|
body temperature on ABR
|
low temp = ABR latencies increase
high temp=less studiesd |
|
sedatives and hypnotics on ABR
|
ex. chloral hydrates don't affect
ex. depressants can affect late potentials |
|
anesthetic agents
|
especially important during intraoperative monitoring
need to know how will affect ABR ABR not seriously influenced by anesthesia |
|
halothane and isoflurant
|
at most causes slight delays in ABR interwave latencies w/o altering morphology
|
|
nitrous oxide
|
ABR is resistant
|
|
alcohcol
|
II, VII are increased but amps are not affected
|
|
what is calibration and why do we do it
|
calibration=adjustment of equipment or application of defined correction factor when using equipment.
why we do it=should do it periodically to ensure properly functioning equipment |
|
problems with relying on published norms
|
1. inflexibility in test protocol
2. few carefully defined and published norms 3. data bases might be more for different kinds of specific patients |
|
how to establish normative data base
|
1. must establish how analyze waveform amp and latency (ex. peaks, shoulder ext) (draw diagrams to aid)
2. for ABR: minimally want values for I, III, IV and interweave latencies, V/I ratio 3. some equipment has software to aid 4. establish norms using cutoff criterion for normality (usually 2-2.5 stdev above mean value for normal subject group) |
|
case reports
|
-limit one page
-always include copies of waves w/ latencies marked and summarized in table -always include test parameters |
|
when does ECochG occur
|
1st 2-3 msec after abrupt stamp
|
|
anatomic and physicologic bases of EcOCHl
|
consists of 2 sound evoked cochlear potentials and compound 8th cranial nerve action potential
-2 potentials evoked by sound=CM and SM |
|
CM
|
alternating current potential that follows waveform of stim; pure tone produces it in a sine like way
-arises from OHC -reflects OHC activity from basal end of BM -best evoked by single polarity stim |
|
SP
|
direct current potential recorded following a continuous tone or tangent stim
-more prominent when recorded w/ high fq tone burst -shift in baseline of recording |
|
when is SP clearly observed
|
with extremely rapid stim and relatively more prominent when recorded w/ high fq tone burst stim
|
|
SP from
|
not totally sure but think from outer and inner hair cells
|
|
AP
|
far-field representation of compound AP of 8th cranial nerve
-also referred to as NO -same as ABR Wave I |
|
what does the AP reflect
|
synchronous firing of many 8th nerve fibers, thus amp is largest for transient stim with abrupt and rapid rise times
|
|
what happens to the AP with increases in stim intensity
|
increase amplitude and decrease latency
|
|
AP from
|
distal portion of 8th nerve
|
|
infancy and childhood ECohG
|
can get NI as early as 27 weeks
-latency will be prolonged and amp reduced in comparison to adults - |
|
advancing age ECoHG
|
not must research pertaining to age and gender
-expect presbycusis HL will have an effect |
|
body temp ECohG
|
studied in animals
-hypothermia: CMP reduced, latency has little change -varibale changed for SP |
|
attention.arousal on ECohG
|
no effect
|
|
muscular artificat and ECOhG
|
minimal effect
|
|
effect of stim FQ on ECohG
|
SP is direct current shift receptor potential
-SP follows envelope of stim -AP component most often generated w/ CLICK stim (possible to use filtered clicks or shaped tone burst) |
|
stim duration and EchoG
|
CM and SP be be generated w/ wide range
-extend duration=SP will persists for duration of stim VS. AP only immediately follows stim |
|
AP stim duration
|
-depends on abrupt onset stim only onset portion of stim contributes to response
-AP not deteced w/ stim rise time of 10msec or greater |
|
analysis time for EchoG
|
range of 0-5/10 msec
-if you only need echo use 5msec -if you want combo echocg and abr use 10-15 msec |
|
montage for EchoG
|
noninverting electrode=tiptode
inversiting electrode=mastoid/earlop ipsis to stim or contra to stim if you have non and in on same sade for ECochG may yield smaller AP amp |
|
filters for EChoG
|
CM reflects stim polarity and fq=filter settings must be wide enough to encompass signals
-typically use bandpass filter setting of 3-10 Hz or 1500-3000 Hz |
|
stim factors EChoG general
|
-AP latency dec slightly and amp increases as stim intensity increases
-SP not seen at lower intensity levels -CM only present w/ mono phasic stim polarity (rare or condense) -increase stim rate will eventually reduce AP amp vs. SP will remain unchanged -morphology changes dramatically with click vs.tone burst and also for low vs. high fq tone hurts |
|
EChoG uses
|
1. objective indentation of Menieres/hydrops
2. enhancement of wave I and identification of I-V interweave interval in presence of HL or less than optimal recording options 3. monitoring of cochlear and aud serve function during surgical procedures that place ear at risk for permanent damage |
|
SP/AP ratio of ___considered abnormal
|
.45 (>45% of AP amp)
|
|
stimulus parameters effects on ABR
|
1. increase intensity=decrease latency and increase amplitude
2. rate= Fast stim rates will increase latencies of all components and the decrease amplitude of the earlier components. 3. frequency 4. polarity=condensation, rarefraction, alternating • rarefraction=later latencies |
|
When and why to mask
|
Mask whenever it is loud enough to cross over. It would look like a normal ABR when it should be normal when it should be abnormal. Just put in 50 dBnHL to the nontest ear.
|
|
how to make Wave I best
|
Wave I=largest amp with click at high intensity
also useful to use transtympanic or ear canal or TM |
|
Why should u do ABR before CT/MRI
|
Should do ABR first because it is readily available, inexpensive, noninvasive, office procedure w/ proeven high sensitivity, and may reflect small lesions not visible with CT
|
|
What are contralateral recordings used for:
|
• Determine presence and location of wave I by comparison to contra recording and obtain better definition of waves IV and V b/c they tend to be more separating in contra-recordings.
|
|
Transducers
|
• TDH-39: need to eliminate electromagnetic arificated by using shielding earphone
• THD-49: better suited for AEP esp for high fq or click • ER-3A: travel time in tube, must correct (.9), less artifact b/c transducer is away from electrode, less ringing, no collapse canals • Bone vibrator: restricteded intensity range, use most successfully in newborns, must be aware of occlusion effect |
|
specificity
sensitivity |
Specificity relates to the ability of the test to identify negative results.
Sensitivity relates to the test's ability to identify positive results. |
|
what kind of masking to use for tone ABR
|
use notched noise
recommended for infants b/c you don't know their HL only essential for steep losses |
|
when to use bone
|
if you wanted to determine conductive HL
used most successfully in newborns and young children -expected down to 20 dB for 500 Hz and 30 dB for 2000 Hz |