- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
17 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Defimation
|
False statments that hurt someones rep
Four elements-Facts that plantiff must prove -Defamatory statement -Falseness -communicated -injury |
|
opinion
|
Valid defense in a defamation suit
|
|
Public personalities/officials
|
recive less protection from def. Can win a case only by proving actual malice by the defendant.(Actually knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard of the truth.)
|
|
Online defamation
|
Immune from 3rd party postings
|
|
Absolute privilege
|
Defendants receive additional protection from def cases when it is important for them to speak.
|
|
Qualified privilege
|
Exists between two people who have a legitimate need to exchange information.
|
|
False imprisonment
|
A store may detain a customer or worker for alleged shoplifting provided there is reasonable basis for the suspicion and the detention is done reasonably
|
|
Infliction of emotional distress
|
A tort. It can be the intentional infliction of emotional distress, meaning that the defendant behaved outrageously and deliberately caused the plaintiff severe psychological injury, or it can be the negligent infliction of emotional distress, meaning that the defendant’s conduct violated the rules of negligence.
|
|
Compensatory
|
Money intended to restore a plantiff to the position he was in before the injury.
Medical lost wages pain and suffering |
|
Guide post for awarding punitive damages
|
The rehensibility of the defendants conduct
the ratio between the harm suffered and the award diff between the punitive award and any civil penalties used in sim cases |
|
punitive award
|
should not be 9 times greater than compensatory damages
|
|
Tort reform
|
non economic damages (pain and suffering) cant exceed 3 times the economic damages or 250k total
|
|
tortious interference with a contract
|
There was a contract between the plaintiff and 3rd party
defendant knew of contract defendant improperly induced the 3rd party to breach the contract or made performance of the contract imposs there was injury to the plaintiff |
|
justification
|
Defendants defense to claim that special circumstances made its conduct fair.
show that it was acting to protect an existing economic interest -acting in the public interest -the contract could be term at will |
|
tortious interference with a prospective advantage
|
need be no contract. a plantiff who has a definite and reasonable expectation of obtaining an economic advantage may sue corp that maliciously interferes and prevents the relationship from developing.
|
|
commercial exploitation
|
prohibits the use of someones likeness or voice for commercial purposes
|
|
lanham act
|
broad protection against false statements intended to hurt another business
plantiff must prove 3 things that the defendants made false or misleading fact statements about the plaintiffs business that they used it in commercial advertising or promo statements create likelihood of harm to the plaintiff |