- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
What is cohesion?
|
an object must always maintian a single bounded contour
|
|
Do OSPB persist through cohesion violations?
|
Not fully
|
|
What is a low-level visual feature?
|
colors, size, shape
"it's red" |
|
What is a higher-level object type?
|
object identification
"it's a duck" |
|
What is an object file?
|
A midlevel visual representation that "sticks" to a moving object over time on the basis of spatiotemporal properties and stores (and updates) information about that object's properties
|
|
What is an object-specific preview benefit?
|
Faster to name final letter when its on the same object that it was initially
|
|
What is the object-reviewing paradigm?
|
Number of objects shown, letters on two; objects move, then a letter appears on one of the objects, must name that letter
|
|
What are three possible outcomes of splitting a moving object into two?
|
1) Obliterate object file's contents
2) Survive the splitting intact, but stay bound to only one of the two objects 3) Be "copied" to both of the two resulting objects |
|
How did the trials begin?
|
Two circles presented as black outlines on a white background, on which a letter soon appeared
|
|
What is the splitting condition?
|
One gradually split into two identical circle, one moving upward and one moving downward
|
|
What is the trajectory-change condition?
|
One followed one of the upward or downward paths from the splitting condition
|
|
What was the purpose of the trajectory-change condition?
|
A control
|
|
What change did Mitroff et al make from the object-reviewing paradigm?
|
Press key to indicate one of two options: target letter was same as a preview letter or it was different
|
|
What is a no-match trial?
|
Target letter did not appear in either of the original circles.
|
|
What is a match trial?
|
Target letter apears in one of the original circles
|
|
What is a congruent match trial?
|
Target letter same as preview letter that initially appeared on that circle
|
|
What is an incongruent match trial?
|
Target letter same as preview letter that initially appeared on the OTHER initial circle
|
|
Did the condition affect the accuracy?
|
no (means that people do not have a harder time identifying a split)
|
|
What was the displaywide priming effect?
|
Responses on no-match trials were significantly slower than responses on either types of match trials
|
|
How was the OSPB defined?
|
As the difference between congruent-match and incongruent-match trials
|
|
What OSPBs were most adversely affected by the changes?
|
The upward and downward split
|
|
What is the conclusion of this experiment?
|
That the maintenance of object files of adult visual cognition is constrained by a principle of cohesion
|
|
What are the two interpertations of results?
|
1) Survived splitting, but went with only one of the objects
2) Split in half, strength halved |
|
Which interpretation is more likely?
|
Split in half, strength halved-- no bimodality in the data
|