• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Card Range To Study

through

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
T or F
In April of 1952, during the Korean War, President Truman issued an executive order directing Secretary of Commerce Charles Sawyer to seize and operate most of the nation's steel mills. This was done in order to avert the expected effects of a strike by the United Steelworkers of America.
T
What is the question presented in this case?
Did the President have the constitutional authority to seize and operate the steel mills?
What was the Court's decision?
The Court held that the President did not have the authority to issue such an order. The Court found that there was no congressional statute that authorized the President to take possession of private property. The Court also held that the President's military power as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces did not extend to labor disputes.
What was the legal provision scrutinized in this case?
US Constitution Article II
Who is the petitioner?
Youngstown
Who is the respondent?
Sawyer
Was the executive order issued by Truman based on specific statutory authority?
No
On what basis did the administration justify the executive order?
basis of inherent presidential power
What was the holding of the district court?
Against the seizure, issuing a preliminary injunction and rejecting the theory of inherent power.
What was the holding of the DC Circuit?
Stayed the injunction pending review by the Supreme Court
T or F
The mill owners argument was that the President's order amounts to lawmaking, a legislative function which the Const. has expressly confided to the Congress, not the President.
T
T or F
It was believed that this technique of seizure would not interfere with the process of collective bargaining.
F, it would interfere.
The judgement by the District Court was _____ by the S Court.
Affirmed