- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
20 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
metapopulations
|
a population broken into sets of subpopulations held together by dispersal or movements of individuals among them
|
|
local/within-patch scale
|
individuals and interact with each other in the course of their routine feeding and breeding activities
|
|
regional scale
|
includes the set of local populations that compse the metapopulations
|
|
rescue effect
|
an increase in population size and a decrease in the risk of extinction brought about by an increase of immigration into a population
|
|
mainland-island metapopulation structure
|
a single habitat patch is the dominant source of individuals emigrating to other habitat patches within a metapopulation network
|
|
source population
|
area where a population of a species reproductively produces more individuals than needed for replacement; these individuals then emigrate to other areas
|
|
sink population
|
area where population of a species can be maintained only by immigration
|
|
source habitat
|
area of habitat in which a subpopulation of a species produces more individuals than needed for self-maintenance, thus contributing to emigration
|
|
sink habitat
|
a habitat area that receives immigrants from a source habitat, but in which the subpopulation would continually decrease in size because of mortality and poor reproductive success without continual immigration from excess individuals in a source habitat.
|
|
4 conditions that define metapopulations
|
discreteness- patches are mostly isolated
extinction and size- patches must be small enough to have a risk of extinction isolation and recolonization- patches must have enough movement between them to allow repopulation asynchronous population dynamics- patches don't affect each others' population growth |
|
colonization
|
movements of individuals from occupied patches to unoccupied patches
|
|
dynamic equilibrium
|
balance between extinction and establishment of new populations, a mosaic of occupied and unoccupied patches with the same ratio between the two
|
|
habitat fragmentation
|
breaking up a continuous population into a network of local populations
often due to human alterations on the landscape |
|
corridors
|
pathways of suitable habitat between patches that allow animal movement to alleviate isolation
|
|
metapopulation persistence
|
depends on patch size and isolation.
more distance between patches decreases recolonization smaller patches have a greater risk of local extinction |
|
habitat heterogeneity
|
more variety of niches allows species diversity
larger patches have a greater potential for heterogeneity more heterogeneity reduces impact of environmental stochasticity |
|
spatial heterogeneity
|
diversity in spatial environment niches
example: trees |
|
asynchronous population dynamics
|
between patches, required for metapopulations
less synchronization means more persistent metapopulation |
|
ephemeral habitat
|
short-lived habitat
|
|
colonization and dispersal
|
colonization is dependent on dispersal rate, which is dependent on natural selection
high fecundity goes with high dispersal rates |