- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
105 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
waveform abnormalities
|
extra peaks
bifid wave I fused peaks |
|
bifid wave I
|
wave I has 2 closely spaced peaks
more likely to happen with fast stimulus rate |
|
fused peaks
|
2 peaks combine into a single wave complex
most often fused are waves IV and V wave IV appears as a hump, short plateau |
|
extra peaks
|
peaks that are reliable but smaller in amplitude than major peaks
|
|
What do you look at to determine if you have an abnormal pattern?
|
absolute latency patterns
interwave latency pattern amplitude patterns |
|
stimuli used to evoke ABR
|
AC: tone burst, click
BC |
|
3 methods for evoking frequency specific ABR's
|
1. Mask frequency regions not intended to be part of the stimulus
2. Responses to stimulus at specific frequency or with a defined frequency region is derived from two other responses 3. Use a tonal stimulus (spectrally constrained stimulus) |
|
What would happen to your recording if you increased/decreased the stimulus intensity?
|
increase intensity: latency decreases, amplitude increases
decrease intensity: latency increases, amplitude decreases |
|
Stimulus properties
|
frequency
duration: sum of rise time, plateau time, fall time intensity rate: # of stimulus presented/second polarity: direction of waveform |
|
ISI
|
interstimulus interval
interval between successive stimuli can be determined by dividing discrete time period by # of stimuli presented within that period short ISI: can decrease amplitude, increase latency |
|
condensation
|
stimulus onset produced by movement of transducer diaphragm toward TM
|
|
rarefaction
|
pressure wave in negative direction produced by movement of transducer diaphragm away from TM
|
|
neurodiagnosis
|
8th cranial nerve, cerebellopontine angle, extraaxial pathology
|
|
Most powerful neurodiagnostic application of ABR
|
-early identification of tumors within the posterior fossa and involving the 8th cranial nerve
-use ABR to differentiate between cochlear and retrocochlear hearing loss |
|
ABR used in evaluation of tumors
|
-use in combo with ECochG
-diagnostic parameter with ABR=interwave latency |
|
Possible ABR findings with tumor
|
-undetectable responses at max stim level even though patient may have no or a mild-mod hearing loss
-usually find this in patient with large tumor |
|
4 latency criteria for retrocochlear pathology
|
1. Absolute latency of wave V exceeds clinical definition of normal limits
2. Abnormal interear or interaural latency difference for wave V 3. Wave I-V latency abnormal prolonged relative to norms 4. Abnormal interaural latency difference for I-V |
|
tumor size
|
patients with large tumors will have no recordable ABR vs. patients with small tumors
|
|
tumor factors that affect ABR
|
location of tumor
consistency of tumor status of blood supply rate of tumor growth |
|
stacked ABR
|
-procedure for detecting tumors smaller than 1 cm
-derived narrowband ABR technique consists of simultaneous presentation of click and high pass filtered noise |
|
Why would you use stacked ABR?
|
when you suspect a small tumor
|
|
How does stacked ABR work?
|
portion of cochlea masked by high pass noise does not contribute to ABR
-cutoff freq lowered each run -narrowband contributions from cochlea are derived from subtraction of responses to successive high pass noise masking conditions |
|
stacked ABR wave V latencies
|
longer for each successive derived ABR
-reflects cochlear response time composed of TW delay |
|
stacked ABR method
|
created by time shifting derived band waveforms so peak latencies of wave V in each derived band coincide and add these together
|
|
non-pathologic characteristics
|
age effects
body temperature attention/state of arousal drugs |
|
age effects-infancy
|
ABR waveforms incomplete at birth
-may only see I, III, V and interwave latency values are prolonged -during 1st 18 months, other components emerge, III and V shorten in latency |
|
age effects-18 months to 2 years
|
ABR is essentially adult like in latency and amplitude
|
|
ABR measurement factors in newborns
|
-low freq stimuli better
-increased rate produces more pronounced increase in ABR latency |
|
age effects-advancing age
|
-latency increased over age range of 25 to 55 (0.2msec)
-I-V interval increases over age range 60-86 |
|
gender effects
|
females show shorter latency values and larger amplitudes vs males for later waves (III, IV, V, VI) so interwave latencies are shorter for females
|
|
body temperature
|
when temps exceed 1 degree of normal (98.6,37) is a factor in affecting recordings
|
|
high body temp
hyperthermia |
effects less studied than low temp
|
|
low body temp
hypothermia |
latencies increase because synaptic transmission is delayed, anoxal conduction velocity is decreased
-temp <14-20 degrees ABR disappears |
|
hypothermia correction factor
|
0.2 ms for every degree below average for I-V latencya
|
|
hyperthermia correction factor
|
0.15 ms for every degree increase above normal for I-V latency
|
|
attention/state of arousal
|
ABR recordings are independent of state of arousal and attention
-gives ABR an advantage in evaluating periperal/central aud function in a wide variety of patients |
|
ototoxic drugs
|
can use ABR to monitor effects of ototoxic drugs if behavioral testing not possible
|
|
CNS drugs- sedatives & hypnotics
|
-chloral hydrate: no effect
-phenobarbitol: can increase variability in late potentionsl |
|
muscular artifact
|
ABR components can be obscured by excessive muscle artifact
|
|
calibration
|
adjustment of equipment or application of defined correction factor when using equipment
-do it to meet performance criterions -do periodically to ensure properly functioning equipment |
|
normative date
|
can make comparisons to normative data collected within a clinic facility or in reference to existing external sources of data
|
|
how to establish normative data
|
-establish how to analyze waveform amp and latency
-draw diagrams to aid others -need latency values for I, III, V, interwave latencies, amplitudes for I, V; V:I amp ratio |
|
3 problems with relying on published norms
|
1. inflexibility in test protocol
2. few carefully defined and published normative databases for threshold ABRs, ECochG, MLR 3. For certain ABR applications, databases might be more appropriately obtained from patients who are not necessarily normal but who simply do not have the pathology of interest |
|
problems with generating own norms
|
time consuming, availability of normal subjects, must do norms over if you change a setting
|
|
things to consider when establishing norms
|
-instrumentation
-subject characteristics -stimulus parameters -acquisition parameters |
|
case reports
|
-limit to one page if possible
-include copies of actual ABR waveforms w/latencies marked and summarized in table |
|
things to include in report
|
copies of ABR waveforms
test parameters latency values |
|
ECochG
|
-occurs within 1st 2-3 msec after abrupt stimulus
-consists of 2 sound evoked cochlear potentials and compound 8th cranial nerve action potential |
|
2 sound evoked potentials
|
cochlear microphonic and summating potential
|
|
Cochlear microphonic
|
-alternating current potential that follows waveform of stimulus
-pure tone stimulus produces CM that appears like a sine wave of same frequency -arises from OHCs -best evoked by sinngle polarity stim, alternating will cancel it out |
|
Summating potential
|
-direct current potential recorded following a continuous tone or a transient stim
-shift in baseline of recording, usually occurs in same direction or just prior to compound AP of 8th nerve -precise source unknown -clearing observed with extremely rapid stim and more prominent with high frequency tone burst stim |
|
Action potential
|
-far-field representation of compound AP of 8th cranial nerve
-also called N1 -same as ABR wave I -reflects synchronous firing of 8th nerve fibers -amp is largest for transient stim with abrupt and rapid rise times -amp inc, latency decreases with stim intensity |
|
SP amp depends on electrode site
|
larger amp with promontory electrode placement versus EAM
|
|
AP amp and latency
|
amplitude increases and latency decreases with stimulus increase
|
|
ECochG analysis time
|
-range of 5-10 msec
-if you want to record only ECOchG, use 5 msec -If you want ECochG and ABR, use 10-15 msec |
|
ECochG filters
|
typically use bandpass filter settings of 3 or 10 Hz to 1500 or 3000 Hz
|
|
Use of ECochG
|
-objective identification of Meniere's disease and endolymphatic hydrops
-enhancement of wave I and identification of I-V interwave interval -monitoring of cochlear and auditory nerve function during surgical procedures that place ear at risk for permanent damage |
|
SP/AP ratio
|
ratio of 0.45 or greater is considered abnormal
|
|
Neoplasms and tumors
|
brainstem glioma
-most often found in children and adolescents -grow slowly and are highly invasive -have ABR abnormalities |
|
Demyelinating and demyelinating diseases
|
affect the myelin sheath of neurons, affecting axons of both CND and peripheral nervous system
|
|
Multiple Sclerosis
|
most common demyelinating and major cause of neurologic impairment in adults
-more prevalent in colder climates |
|
ABR for MS
|
-prolonged interwave latencies
-decreased amp -poor morphology -poor repeatability -total absence of components -most characteristic: increased wave V latency |
|
Schilder disease
|
-progresisve childhood disease
-considered childhood MS -deafness, blindess, death in 1-5 years |
|
tumor location in adults
|
70% found in supratentrial compartment of brain
|
|
tumor location in children
|
70% found in infratentorial (within posterior fossa) for children
|
|
8th nerve tumors
|
schwannomas
neurofibromas menigiomas |
|
intracranial neoplasm
|
glioma
meningioma |
|
schwanomma
|
most common 8th nerve tumor
grow slowly hearing loss is common complaint |
|
neurofibroma
|
NF1 and NF2
NF! more common tumors arise from Schwann cells see hearing loss in over 90% |
|
meningioma
|
if it involved 8th nerve, difficult to distinguish from schwanoma
-ABRs abnormal -found in various intracranial regions |
|
what do contralateral recordings tell you
|
1. when doing contralateral, make sure you dont have bilateral tumors, or serious hearing impairment in other ear
2. abr recordings from contralateral ear may provide diagnostically useful info on tumor size and functional effects |
|
3 categories of contralateral abnormalities
|
1. normal wave I-III, prolonged III-V
2. abnormal wave I-III and normal wave III-V 3. no detectable wave V with either normal or abnormal wave I-III latency interval |
|
low frequency sensory HL
|
click=normal ABR and LI functions
|
|
mid and high freq SNHL
|
wave V latency increases as HL at 4kHz increases
|
|
sensory losses
|
steeper than normal LI function, see minimal latency increase in wave V at high stim intensity levels
|
|
low intensity levels for sensory losses
|
wave I disappears because only more apical regions of cochlea are activated
|
|
severe to profound cochlear pathologies
|
usually dont see ABR
|
|
mod high frequency SNHL
|
wave V LI is steeper than normal, wont see wave V at low intensity levels
|
|
noise induced SNHL
|
increase in absolute latency of I, III, V
|
|
in general auditory nerve and or brainstem disorders
|
latency of V prolonged at all intensities
-Wavw V LI may be same as conductive |
|
How do different stimulus factors effect ECochG
|
-AP latency decreases slightly and amp increases as stim intensity increases
-SP not seen at lower intenisty levels -CM only present with mono-phasic stim polarity -increase stim rate will eventually reduce AP amp vs SP will remain the same -morphology changes dramatically with click vs tone and also for low freq vs high frequency tone bursts |
|
Wave I
|
largest amp with click at high intensity
|
|
Why would you do an ABR prior to an MRI/CT
|
should use ABR first because it is inexpensive, readily available, noninvasive, office procedure with proven high sensitivity and may reflect small lesions not visible with CT
|
|
contralateral recordings
|
determine presence and location of wave I by comparison to contra recording
-obtain better definition of waves IV and V because they tend to be more separate in contra recordings |
|
ways tumor interfere with generation of ABR
|
1. compression or stretching of the 8th nerve fibers by expanding tumor mass resulting in desynchronization of 8th nerve fibers or increased resistance in nerve conduction velocity
2. compromised blood supply to 8th nerve and cochlea |
|
TDH-39 earphone
|
need to eliminate electromagnetic artifact by using shielded earphone
|
|
TDH-49 with same cushion
|
better suited for AEP measures, especially for high frequency or click stimulus
-frequency response in 1-4kHz is more uniform |
|
ER-3A
|
must be aware of travel time=0.9
-less stim artifact beacuse transducer is away from electrodes -less ringing -less collapsed canals -reduces possible cross over of stim -reduces ambient noise |
|
bone-conductor
|
-be aware of occlusion effect
-restricted intensity range-only about 55 dB -best in newborns |
|
tone burst misconceptions
|
1. tone ABR thresholds are not similar to behavioral thresholds
2. ABR to 500 hz are poor indicators of low freq behavioral thresholds 3. waveform identification of ABR to 500 hz is difficult |
|
stimulus duration of tone ABR
|
-sum of rise, plateau, fall
-ex. 2-1-2 -times change with frequency |
|
filter setting of tone ABR
|
use high pass filter setting of 20-30 Hz to avoid eliminating a significant amount of the response
|
|
analysis time of tone ABR
|
25 ms needed to incorporate increased latencies seen with decreasing stim intensty, HL, brainstem and infant pathology
|
|
stim rate of tone ABR
|
39.1/s for tones, could go up to 61, but not with a 25 ms analysis time
|
|
morphology of tone ABR
|
-consists primarily of V and negativity V
-typically dont see I-IV at low-mod intensities or high intensities |
|
latency of tone ABR
|
-low freq tones are later than those in responses to higher frequency tones presented at the same intensities
-reflects cochlear travel time |
|
masking for tone ABR
|
-notched noise masking
-reccomened for infants b/c you dont know hearing loss, but only essential for testing when patients have steep losses -one-octave wide notch centered on nominal frequency of the stim |
|
bone conducted ABR
|
-use to determine conductive hearing loss
-expected down to 20 dbnHL for 500 Hz and 30 dBnHL for 2000 Hz |
|
specificity
|
ability to identify negative results show that the person does not have the disease
|
|
sensitivity
|
ability to identify positive results
|
|
Don (1997)
|
-stacked ABR wave V amplitude is more sensitive than standard ABR wave V amplitude measures to a small reduction in or desynchronization of auditory neural activity that may result from compression by a small tumor
- |
|
Eggermont (1989)
|
-babies can fail screenings because of temporary conductive loss-bone ABR could be better
-latencies can change as structures mature -wave I stays the same-shows cochlea matures |
|
Gorga et al (1985)
|
Click abr compared to behavioral thresholds
-best at 2000 Hz, worst at 8000Hz -LI function related to slope of loss but was very variable |
|
Musiek (1986)
|
-with 8th nerve tumors, I-III usually abnormal, but III-V can also be normal
-ABR interwave measurement has better specificity than sensitivity |
|
Stapells (1995)
|
ABR to tones in notched-noise technique gave accurate estimates of pure-tone behavioral sensitivity for all frequencies
|