- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
PLAY BUTTON
PLAY BUTTON
10 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Define "Relevant Evidence"
|
Evidence having tendency to make the existence of any fact THAT IS OF CONSEQUENCE more or less probable than without the evidence
|
|
What rule is Relevant Evidence discussed?
|
401
|
|
What two requirements are necessary to show that evidence is relevant?
|
1. Evidence must be probative of the proposition it is offered to prove,
2. The proposition to be proved must be one that is of consequence to the determination of the action. |
|
What does Rule 401 cover?
|
The Relevant Evidence Rule
|
|
What does rule 403 cover?
|
Exclusion of evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
|
|
What does Rule 407 cover?
|
Subsequent Remedial Measures.
|
|
What rule talks about Subsequent Remedial Measures?
|
407
|
|
What types of cases can Subsequent Remedial Measures be used?
|
Evidence can not be admitted to prove NEGLIGENCE, CULPABLE CONDUCT, PRODUCT DEFECT, OR NEED FOR WARNING OR INSTRUCTION
|
|
(R) Subsequent remedial measures
|
If measures are taken after-the-fact that would have prevented the occurrence, in certain cases, the fact of the measures cannot be admitted.
|
|
"That valve was not mine." But they fixed it after the accident. What rule can you use to hang accident on them?
|
407 lets you admit evidence of subsequent measures to show evidence.
|
