GMS 302 for Final Exam May 3rd

1.Forming
2.Storming
3.Norming
4.Performing

ORDER IS IMPORTANT!

FORMING

STORMING

NORMING

PERFORMING

FORMING

STORMING

NORMING

PERFORMING

1.Manages the team
2.Serves as the contact point
3.Keeps the records
4.Serves as a team member
5.Ensures the goal is achieved

1.Title or Headline
2.Sub-title
3.Introduction/Lead
4.Body/Content
5.Company Bio
6.Ending Indicator - ###
7.Contact Information

The author lists 2 objectives. They are to keep the applicant from:

1.Spending a significant amount of money on plans that won’t get approved
2.Spending a significant amount of money on plans when a simple application process is all that is needed

The requirement to publicize a meeting, workshop, or forum that will result in an official decision.

Any decision by an agency that requires a public hearing requires public noticing.

1.Creates a link between planning and development
2.The opinions of citizens and stakeholders are heard
3.Land use decisions are based on standards and criteria, not popularity
4.Balances citizen involvement with land owner’s need for predictability

1927-1945 – Traditionalists – Loyal
1946-1964 – Baby Boomers – Optimistic
1965-1980 – Generation X – Skeptical
1981-1999 – Millennials - Realistic

1.Traditionalists – the Great Depression, WWII
2.Baby Boomers – Viet Nam War, Watergate, Civil Rights Movement, Women’s Movement, Environmental Movement
3.Generation X – Challenger Disaster, 1st Gulf War, 9/11, Latchkey Kids, Divorced Parents, Working Moms
4.Millennials – 9/11, War on Terror, Child-centric society, technology

1.Electoral Engagement
Registering to vote
Voting
2.Non-electoral Engagement
Contacting a public official
Boycotting or buying a product based on the values of the company
3.Group Engagement
Belonging to any group: religious, sports, civic, etc.
4.Community Engagement
Any volunteer activity
Going to a public meeting
Doing favors for neighbors
Working to solve a community problem

*According to the National Conference on Citizen Engagement

Assertiveness- High
Cooperation- Low

Assertiveness- Low
Cooperation- Low

Assertiveness- Middle
Cooperation- Middle

Assertiveness- High
Cooperation- High

Assertiveness-Low
Cooperation- High

1.Feel their interests have been considered and respected
2.Have been involved in the shaping of the solution (weigh in to buy in)
3.Have developed a working relationship with the other parties
4.See how the solution is linked to their self-interests
5.See the solution as fair and necessary
6.Perceive the risk of not accepting the solution to be greater than the cost of accepting the solution

1.Don’t understand the solution
2.Don’t understand why the solution is good for all parties
3.Think the status quo is fine
4.Perceive they are being treated unfairly
5.Believe that what they are being asked to do is unnecessary
6.Think they have other options that are better for them

Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement

Establishes the basic right of access to most meetings of boards, commissions and other governing bodies and local government agencies or authorities.

1.Affected economically
2.Use or want to use a resource
3.Live in proximity of the issue
4.Have a legal mandate affected by the issue

A monetary interest in the outcome of a decision by the decision maker or a member of their immediate family.

Contacts that occur between the decision maker and a person interested in the decision outside the public process and not in the public record .

2 Limitations:

1.Limitations relative to quickly noticing a meeting
2.Although accessible to the public via the internet, the public may not think to look there

People who typically have a stake in the outcome.

1.Stakeholders are self-selecting
2.Local governments are given a legal mandate (legislation enabling local jurisdiction)
3.Local governments have budget considerations
4.Local governments have the responsibility to weigh undesirable impacts of one community against the beneficial impacts for the larger society

1.Standards
2.Regulations
3.Science
4.Technology
5.Expertise