- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
PLAY BUTTON
PLAY BUTTON
27 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Falsificationism
|
Popper
|
|
Problem of Induction
|
Popper
|
|
The discovery of neptune is compatible with...
|
Kuhn's account of normal science
|
|
The discovery of neptune presents problem's with...
|
Popper's model of falsification
|
|
Context of justification
|
Popper
|
|
Bodies of theory
|
Duheim
|
|
Choose what to reject/falsify
|
Duheim
|
|
"Crucial experiment"
|
Duheim/Reductio ad absurdum
|
|
Crucial experiment is appropriate to...
|
math, not science
|
|
Duheim challenges...
|
Popper
|
|
Normal science
|
Kuhn
|
|
Paradigm
|
Kuhn
|
|
_'s model is more compatible with the discovery of Neptune than Popper
|
Kuhn
|
|
Detailed research -> Detailed Knowledge
|
Kuhn
|
|
Puzzle solving
|
Kuhn's Paradigms
|
|
Hempel's model
|
D-N Model
|
|
Deterministic means deductively valid
|
D-N Model
|
|
Provides explanations as well as predictions
|
D-N Model
|
|
No way of distinguishing laws from accidentals generalizations with this model
|
D-N Model
|
|
"Why?" answers are only accepted if compatible with accepted theories
|
van Fraassen
|
|
_ different senses of seeing says this Philosopher
|
2, Hanson
|
|
We just see, there is no two step process of observation and interpretation
|
Hanson
|
|
_ says theory-ladenness of _
|
Hanson, observation
|
|
The interlocutor of _'s argument says that we interpret what we see
|
Hanson
|
|
Multi-layered
|
observation, Hanson
|
|
Accepted theories
|
Hanson
|
|
Visual experiences
|
Hanson
|
