• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

Progress

1/133

Click to flip

133 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Superior medial region
Lesion causes a kinetic mutism, no effort to communicate
Orbital and inferior mesial region
Severe disruption of social conduct
Frontal lobe
Governs executive functions, personality, intellect, speech, memory
Temporal lobe
Governs hearing, naming of objects, memory, emotion, visual recogn.
Hippocampal complex
Lesion: Anterograde declarative memory loss
Amygdala
Lesion: loss of emotional attachment to memories, emotional dyscontrol, kluver-bucy
Parietal lobe
Sensation, speech, understanding, academics
Basal forebrain
Lesion: severe memory deficits in anterograde memory, confabulation
Caudate
Lesion: gross abnormal involuntary movement, subcortical dementia, depression
Putamen
Lesions produce similar picture as caudate, globus palliduc
Substantia nigra
Lesion: fine abnormal involuntary movement, decrease muscle tone, loss of postural control
Corpus striatum
Caudate-putamen
Thalamus
Relay station for basal ganglia and cerebral cortex
Basal ganglia
Caudate, globus pallidus, putamen, substantia nigra
Hypothalamus
Lesions produce hypothermia, insomnia, hormone secretion, hunger, over-reaction to emotional stimuli
Locus coerelus
Number 1 producer of NE in the brain.
Pons governs?
Mood, motor and sensory tracts, wakefulness
Raphe nucleus does?
Produces serotonin. Contains the tract that connects thalamus, basal ganglia, and hypothalamus.
Rates of HIV, new infection
70% of mew infections occur in men. Most, 60% due to men w/ men, 25% injection drugs, 15% hetersex
AIDS defining conditions, T cell count 200-500
Thrush, Kaposi's, TB reactivation, zoster, herpes, bacterial pneumonia
AIDS defining conditions, T cell count, 50-100.
Primary TB, crypto, toxo, PML, cervical carcinoma
AIDS defining conditions, T cell 50-100
CMV, mycobacterium avium, non-hodskins lymphoma, CNS lymphoma, dementia
Nucleoside analague rev transcriptase inhibitors
6 + combo: abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, L + zido
NON nucleoside reverse transcriptase Inhibitors
Delaviridine, Efavirenz, Nevirapine,
Protease inhibitors
Combo+ 5, amprenavir, idinavir, lopinavir-rito, nelfinavir, ritonavir, Saquinavir
NucleoTide analagues
Adefovir
Rate of HIV asymptomatic impairment on neuropsych
22-30%
Diff btwn HIV cognitive impairment and HIV dementia
Cognitive impairment thought to involve cell dysregulation. dementia thought to involve cell death
Diff diagnosis of HIV dementia
CNS opportunistic infections, malignancy, substance abuse or withdrawal
Criteria for HIV cogntive
Acquired cognitive, motor, behavioral abnormalities, mild impairment in ADLs, does not meet criteria for dementia or myelopathy, no other cause
Prevalence of HV dementia
15-20%
Treatment for AIDs induced mania
Zido (penetrates blood brain barrier well.)
Can also cause mania
Rates of delirium in AIDS
43% to 65%
Causes of intracranial delirium in AIDs
Seizures, infections, crypto, encephalitis, PML, mass lesions, lymphoma, toxo
HIV encephalopathy def
Acute onset cognitive deficits
Eval of AMS in AIDs labs
CBC, serum chemistries, arterial blood gas in pts w pneumonia, VDRL, b12
Neuropsych testing in AIDs
AIDs dementia rating scale, finger tapping test, trail making test
HIV kids rate of survival
50% til age 9
HIV progessive encephalopathy in kids
Impaired brain growth, Progrssive motor dysfunction, loss of developmental milestones (plateau)
Rates of co-morbid disorder in AIDs
Depression:60%
Dysthymia: 25%
Anxiety: 25%
substance abuse co-occurring: 50%
Mental alteration test
Verbal version of trail making test. Timed
HIV dementia rating scale
5sections: memory registration, attention, psychomotor speed, memory recall, construction
Executive Interview Test
10 min, 25 bedside test of executive function, word fluency and echopraxia
Women with AIDS, percent black or hispanic
77
Children that have AIDS, percent that are black or hispanic
81
Number of circuits in federal appellate courts
13
Stare decisis
Let the decision stand
Dicta
Expressions in a court's opinion which go beyond the facts before the court and are individual views of the author
Matters of law
Whatever is to be decided by the application of statutory rules or principles of law
Summary judgment
A judges decision to dismiss a civil action as a matter of law because there is no genuine issue of material fact
Granting cert
decision to hear a case requires the agreement of 4 justices
Habeus corpus
'May you have the body.' The primary function of a writ is to release someone from unlawful imprisonment. It does not address guilt or innocence, but whether a person is properly restrained
Probable cause
Reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime; less than 50%
1st Amendment
Freedom of speech
4th Amendment
Freedom from unreasonable serach and seizure
5th and 14 Amendments
Grant due process.
5th: Federal defendants
14th: state defendants
6th Amendment
Right to counsel
8th Amendment
Proscription of cruel and unusual punishment
Matthews v Eldridge
To determine what due process is required:
1. private interest affected by gov actions
2. risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest vs benefit
3. gov's interest
Cases using the 'balancing test'
- In re Richardson
- Addington v Texas
- Parham v JL and JR
- Ake v OK
- Santosky v Kramer
- Washington v Harper
Cases under 'Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights'
- Lessard v Schmidt
- Oconnor v Donaldson
- Rogers v Commissioner
- Estelle v Gamble
Civil (tort law) requires blame: T or F
False
Examples of intentional tort in psychiatry
- False imprisonment
- Violate civil rights
- Sex w patients
- Defamation of character
UNintentional torts
negligence, bx which caused an unreasonable risk of harm
4 D's of negligence / malpractice
- Duty
- Dereliction
- Direct cause
- Damages
Subpoena decus tecum
Command to appear with records
negligence
a defendant 'should be aware of a justifiable and substantial risk but INADVERTANTLY fails to take into account that risk, as would a reasonable person
Specific intent
- Purposely
- Knowingly
General intent
- Purposely
- Knowingly
- Recklessly
Percent of criminal cases that plea
85-90%
Self defense
- justifiable
- necessity
- honest and reasonable belief that death or seriously bodily injury is imminent
Example affirmative defenses
- self defense
- duress
- insanity
- automatism
- entrapment
- necessity
Quasi criminal law goal
to rehabilitate
Ford v. Wainright
8th Amendment: cruel and unusual
demurrer
dismissal for insufficient cause of action
Addington v Texas
Set standard of evidence for civil commitment as clear and convincing
Parham v JR
Parental commitment of a child requires a neutral fact finders' determination that admission requirements are satisfied
Vitek v Jones
Required that transfer f incarcerated prisoner to mental hospital requires written notice and a hearing
Equal protection clause falls under what amedmnt?
14th
Theft vs robbery
Taking something vs taking something with force
Aggravated murder
- malice aforethought
- premeditation
- deliberation
- specific intent
Malice
- intent to kill
- intend to do grievous bodily harm
- wanton disregard
- kill in commission of specific felonies
Voluntary manslaughter
- In hot blood, crime of passion
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
- Intentional or reckless act
- extreme and outrageous
- Causation of emotional distress
Snyder v Phelps
Free speech clause of 1st amendment can serve as a defense in state tort suits for the intentional infliction of emotional distress
Impact rule
Person must be physically impacted. No recovery can be had for injuries sustained by fright occasioned by the negligence of another where there is no IMMEDIATE personal injury.
Dillon v Legg
Foreseeability test: plaintiff located near the scene, direct emotional impact, plaintiff and victim closely related
Thing v LaChusa
Zone of danger test for negligent infliction of emotional distress
Unholy trinity
- Contributory negligence
- Assumption of risk
- Fellow servant (at fault) not emplyer
Carter v General Motors
- Emotional disabilities are compensable whether the cause of such emotional disability is a direct physical injury, a mental shock or sustained pressure
Eggshell plaintiff
- Person with a pre-existing condition that may have increased the likelihood that they could be harmed but the harm was nevertheless caused by the alleged insult
Crumbling skull
- Preexisting condition of such severity that they would have ultimately experienced the harm, even without an intervening insult
Malingering assessment tools
MMPI2
SIMS
SIRS
MFAST
Atypical presentation scale
Pre-trauma vulnerability for PTSD
- childhood abuse
- parental poverty
- unstable family during childhood
- behavior disorder
- poor self confidence before age 15
Common sxs in post concussive syndrome
- anxiety
- sleeping problems
- headaches
- fatigue
- dizziness
substantial risk
strong possibility
components of dangerousness
- magnitude
- likelihood
- imminence
- frequency
positive symptoms associated w violence
- delusions
- hallucinations
- disorganization
- grandiosity
- suspiciousness
negative symptoms associated with violence
- blunted affect
- emotional withdrawal
- poor rapport
- apathy
- lack of spontaneity
- poor abstract thinking
inpatient assaults associated with:
- uncooperativeness
- poor insight
- poor judgment
- violence in the week prior to admission
likely to obey harmful commands
- hallucination- related delusion
- familiar voice
- feelings of personal superiority
- act will benefit hallucinator
delusions associated w violence
- persecutory
- systematized
- assoc w fear, anger, anxiety
- acted on before
- coupled w/ substance abuse
- infidelity
Estelle v Gamble
Violates 5 th Am to introduce at a capital sentence proceeding psych eval that was conducted without informed consent
Barefoot v Estelle
It is ok to use hypothetical questions posed to psychiatrists on dangerousness related to the defendant.

Hypothetical questions were found to be an acceptable basis for psychiatric testimony
Payne v Tennessee
Victim impact statements admissable
Atkins v Virgina
Executions of the mentally retarded are prohibited under the 8th am
Ring v Arizona
Judges determining aggravating factors for increased sentencing violates the 6th Am
Panetti v Quarterman
State courts must provide procedures for a competency to be executed hearing
A petitioner's rational understanding of the reasons for execution should be heard
Ford v Wainright
8th Am prohibits a state from carrying out a sentence of death upon a prisoner who is insane. Comptence to be executed requires at lease 'rational awareness' of reasons for execution.
Estelle v Gamble
Deliberate indifference by prison personnel to a prisoners serious medical illness or injury constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
Farmer v Brennan
A prison official may be found liable if he knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health and safety; the official must be aware of the facts from which an inference could be drawn that a serious risk of harm exists
Baxtrom v Herold
Prisoners must be granted a jury review of their civil commitment in order to be held beyond their sentence, a violation of 14th Am.
McKune v Lile
Sexual Abuse Treatment Program serves a penological purpose. It does not violate the 5th Am.
United States v Georgia
Title II of the ADA applies to state prisons
Rouse v Cameron
Pts have right to treatment if being held NGRI
Wyatt v Stickney
State Mental Hospital must provide:
1. Humane environment
2. Qualified staff in numbers sufficient to administer tx
3. Indiviualized treatment plans
Violates due process 14 Am
Youngberg v Romero
DD / MR patients have a right to freedom from restraint and treament
Must be a 'substantial departure' from accepted professional practice
Rush HMO vs Moran
HMO must review decisions as applicable under state law; ERISA does not pre-empt; 514
ERISA section 502
A civil action may be brought by a participant to recover benefits.
No recovery for pain & suffereing, punitive damages, etc
Aetna vs. Davila
Decisions by MCOs about what kind of care to pay for must be regarded as eligibility decisions, not treament decisions
Corcoran v United Healthcare
ERISA premepts state laws against malpractice for HMOs and prevents recovery for emotional distress
Pegram v Herdich
Mixed treatment and eligibility decisions are not fiduciary decicions
Components of competence
1. Capacity to express choice
2. Capacity to understand relevant information
3.Capacity to understand current situation
4. Capacity to manipulate (reason) rationally
Dusky v US
Comptence inlcudes the ability to properly assist counsel, possess a rational understanding of the proceedings
Wilson v US
Amensia per se does not equal incompetence
Cooper v Oklahoma
Standard of proof for competency is 51% (prepondenrance of the evidence)
Jackson v Indiana
Def cannot be held longer than it takes to determine he is incompetent, since he will not respond to treatment. (MR)
Riggins v Nevada
To force medication in prisoners, state must show:
- no less intrusive alternatives
- meds medically appropriate
- essential for safety
Sell v Nevada
Four factors necessary for involuntary meds:
- Govt interest
- Invol meds must further state interests (meds have to be likely to render person competent)
- Invol meds are necessary and no less intrusive means avail
- Meds must be in patients best interest
Comptency to enter a plea
- Knowing
- Intelligent
- Voluntary
Godinez v Moran
A person who is competent to stand trial is also competent to plead guilty
- Clinicians should ask about comptence to wave rights in a plea bargain
Indiana v Edwards
Comptence to represent self: State may limit a pt from representing himself.
Colorado v Connelly
Involuntary confession must inlcude police coercion