• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

Progress

1/99

Click to flip

99 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
“At its purest and most simple, _________ holds that there is a straightforward one-to-one relationship between the events of the outside world and people’s knowledge of them… the goal of social psychology is to…discover reliable, factual knowledge about the social-world-as-it-really-is.” S-R p 39
positivism
Informed consent
Distress and discomfort
Deception
Debriefing
Alternative perspectives
Ethics in Research
observe and assess a phenomenon without manipulating variables
descriptive research
looking for associations – but saying nothing about causation
correlational research
looking for cause and effect – field and laboratory
experimental designs
A set of statistical procedures used to review a body of evidence by combining the results of individual studies to measure the overall reliability and strength of particular effects
meta analysis
the extent to which the measures used in a study measure the variables they were designed to measure
construct validity
• people connected by common descent – distinct ethnic ‘stock’; distinguished one population from another – usually based on visible traits (skin color; hair, facial features), genes and self-identification
race
• a person’s sense of cultural and historical identity and affiliation, a shared cultural heritage, national characteristics, religion, and language – based on race – or descent from common ancestors
ethnicity
socio-cultural dimensions of being male or female
gender
An amalgam of who we think we are…values; priorities; attitudes; and beliefs
the self-concept
“…mental templates by which we organize our worlds” (Myers, 2003, p 41)
self schemas
William James
the self-as-known (object) – one can describe the self – can be described – including physical traits, possessions, personality characteristics, social roles (multiple social selves), relationships, thoughts and feelings and spirituality
the "me"
William James
the self as knower (subject) - the sense of agency; of uniqueness; the sense of continuity from moment to moment; an awareness of one’s own awareness
the "i"
“…patterns of past behavior, as well as patterns for one’s current and future behavior, and described by two broad modes of being – an independent __________ and an interdependent ___________
self construals
the enduring sense of self
personal self
or collection of selves – defined by context
social self
defined within relationships - family, friends, work
relational self
temperament, reactivity; innate tendencies (e.g. Eysenck concept of introversion-extraversion)
biological self
argues that people know who thy are by observing their own behavior
self-perception theory
describes people whose childhood experiences taught them that they have no control over their destiny
learned helplessness
a sense of confidence that one can perform the behaviors that are demanded in a specific situation
self-efficacy
describes the degree to which a person sites control in themselves or in chance, luck or fate – as a product of their early experience
locus of control
where a person identifies with a social group and categorizes themselves as a member of that group – and adopts the stereotypical behavior and persona expected of members of that group
self-sterotyping
proposes that people’s individual psychological processes (including, crucially, their identities) are transformed in group settings.
social identity theory
the self as insightful, shrewd and intuitive, self-aware and self-monitoring
reflexive
the self as part of a shared system of meaning
connected
the self as always in a state of ‘being in the world’ – where there is no separation between the person and the situation
situated in the world
the self as purposeful and strategic – according to what is at stake in any given situation
intentional
the self as understood or seen through presencing practices – ie where some kind of social reality is made real
the product of presencing practices
the self as a product of common impressions, symbols, ideas, and understanding shared by people rather than being products of individual minds
intersubjective self
one in which the person adopts highly rigid views which are strongly prejudiced
Adorno's authoritarian personality
an approach that underlines the importance of context in the way that people perceive objects – particularly the ideas of figure and ground
gestalt psychology
• People absorb information
• Interpret it in relation to their experience and knowledge
• Store it as an interpreted memory
cognitive schemas
How we explain behavior in terms of internal dispositions or external circumstance
attribution theory
tendency for observers to underestimate situational influences and overestimate dispositional influences
fundamental attribution error
a figure/ground phenomenon – the central focus in observation is the person
actor-observer bias
a conscious state of self-focus therefore heightened sensitivity to our own attributes
self-awareness
individualistic versus collectivist
culturally conditioned
explicit, reflective, conscious
controlled
implicit – effortless, without awareness e.g. schematic connections; emotional reactions; heuristics
automatic
the tendency to be more confident than correct
overconfidence phenomeon
a tendency to perceive relationships where none exists
illusory relationships
an inflated sense of our own control over situations
illusory control
primarily a theory about hoe individuals build up and use ‘personal constructs’ to make sense of and operate within the social world
personal construct theory
we hold onto established beliefs regardless of contradictory information
belief perseverance
we are vulnerable to the ‘priming’ effect – what William James called ‘waking of associations
the misinformation effect
assumes our behavior aims to create a desired impression
self-presentation theory
the tension that arises when we experience two inconsistent cognitions – to reduce the unpleasant feeling – we adjust our thinking
cognitive dissonance theory
we make inferences about who we are based on observations of what we do
self-perception theory
when there is less social pressure around expression of attitudes the relationship is strengthened
social desirability pressure
Specific, relevant attitudes predict behavior
specificity and relevance
An attitude predicts behavior when it is potent
power of the attitude
including position and salience, master statuses – and their relation to the feelings and behavior
structure of social identity
including self enhancement/esteem; existential needs (a ‘coherent self-conception’); control; self-knowledge
function of social identity
a period of free experimentation before a final identity is achieved
psychosocial moratorium
“…the acquisition of a set of beliefs, attitudes, and values about oneself as a man or a woman in many areas of social life, including intimate relations, family, work, community, and religion.”
gender identity
• The child’s knowledge of gender roles shapes their preferences and behavior.
• Parental influence is complex.
• As children learn the rules of gender they begin to establish gender-linked cognitive schemas (Bem 1981).
• Gender rules become more established with age.
• Girls continue to be more flexible with gender rules.
• Children with multiple classification skills are also more flexible.
• Children of non-traditional parents are also more flexible.
learning gender role standards
• How closely your attributes and skills approximate the gender the role standard
• How much the child likes the same sex parent
• The perceived cultural value of each sex
gender preferences influences
…the child identifies with the same sex parent- via the castration complex and the resolution of the Oedipal complex – difficult to test empirically and to a large extent rejected as marginalizing women.
psychoanalytic theory
learning through observation and modeling
social learning theory
sex-role typing follows naturally and inevitably from universal principles of cognitive development
cognitive development theory
“… proposes that sex typing derives in large measure from gender-schematic processing, from a generalized readiness on the part of the child to encode and to organize information …according to the culture’s definition of maleness and femaleness”
gender schema theory
“…a cognitive structure, a network of associations that organizes and guides an individual’s perception.” An “anticipatory structure” Bem (1983 p 603) – “entails a readiness to sort information into categories on the basis of some particular dimension”
schema
“…the child…learns to encode and to organize information in terms of the evolving gender schema.”
gender schematic processing
“…sex-typed individuals are seen to differ from other individuals not primarily in the degree of femininity or masculinity they possess, but in the extent to which their self-concepts and behaviors are organized on the basis of gender rather than on the basis of some other dimension.” p 605
sex typing
“…a component of ongoing interactions in which perceivers emit expectancies, targets (selves) negotiate their own identities, and the context in which interaction occurs shapes the resultant behavior.” p 369
gender in 'context'
• The ‘perceiver’ interprets the targets behavior – often in line with expectations and regardless of confirmation
• The target interprets his/her behavior – and may internalize that interpretation – “In effect, the target person has become the person the perceiver expected.”
the working self concept
A breeding stock of animals; a family, tribe, people or nation belonging to the same stock
stock as a defintion for race
[the] differential concentration of gene frequencies responsible for traits which….are confined to physical manifestations such as skin color or hair form
gene 'frequencies' as a definition for race
Shared physical characteristics, along with area of geographic origin and shared culture
physical characteristics as a definition for race
when discussing or assessing race-related processes at an interpersonal level
sociorace
to refer to intraphysic dynamics assumed to result form racial socialization
psychorace
specific norms, values, attitudes that distinguish that group
culture
including strength of identification; personal, social and political salience; the developmental changes
ethnic identity
some ethnicities are more equal than others
minority status
inequality – socio-economic and political
cultural/ethnicity self-esteem
‘race salience and value’ describes the importance of race at this stage – characterized by “miseducation and self-hatred”
pre-encounter/anti-black
characterized by the adoption of a pro-American or mainstream identity
pre-encounter/assimilation
– a reiteration of original model - a “single event” or a “series of small eye-opening events”
encounter
now can be pro-Black and/or anti-White

The stage is resolved when the heightened emotion of this period is brought under control
immersion/emersion
now collapsed into one stage – with 3 internalized (comfortable) identities
• Black Nationalist – being Black is the only salient identity - expressed through social/political action
• Biculturalist – incorporates two identities – typically a sense of “Blackness” fused with American values
• Multiculturalist – includes a matrix of 3 or more cultural frames of reference
internalization/commitment
group with short term minimal involvement
incidental group
group with typically prolonged contact; a shared commitment; common goals
membership group
group with identification; group affiliation; self-categorization; a frame of reference for a person’s social identity
identity reference group
the ‘mere presence’ hypothesis – e.g. social categorization and the selective allocation of resources; idling or energizing
the minimal group paradigm
Differentiation on the basis of group membership is essentially competitive – either on the level of broad social comparison or ‘realistic’ competition involving incompatible group goals – often based on the distribution of finite resources
social comparison
(inhibition) – the tendency to exert less effort toward a common goal
social loafing
(facilitation) – the strengthening of dominant responses in the presence of other
social energizing
• The conservative nature of groups (Allport 1924)
• The ‘autokinetic effect’ – converging to the mean (Sherif 1936)
• Group norms
conformity
“…the shared standards of conduct expected of group members.” – both explicit and implicit (Stainton Rogers, p. 272)
group norms
• …in group settings they use the judgements of others in the group as a source of reliable information.”
informational mode of influence
“…people follow the norms of the group.”
normative influence
• Loss of awareness and evaluation apprehension
• Particularly in a group situation that fosters responsiveness to group norms
• Influenced by – anonymity; group size; in a situation of diminished self awareness
deindividuation
“…the tendency of group decisions to be more extreme than the mean of the individual decisions made by the group members.”
polarization
focuses on people’s desire for social approval and avoidance of social censure –members try to align themselves with the group position.
social comparison theory
(also informational influence theory) (Burnstein and Vinokur, 1977) highlights the capacity for novel arguments to change people’s opinions.
persuasive arguement theory
highlights people’s tendency to identify with the group – to see it as an in-group and then seek to endorse its particular norms, rules etc specifically in relation to the out-group.
self-catergorization theory
what happens when a small, highly cohesive group of like-minded people becomes so obsessed with reaching consensus that they loose touch with reality and make a catastrophic decision.”
groupthink