- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
99 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
“At its purest and most simple, _________ holds that there is a straightforward one-to-one relationship between the events of the outside world and people’s knowledge of them… the goal of social psychology is to…discover reliable, factual knowledge about the social-world-as-it-really-is.” S-R p 39
|
positivism
|
|
Informed consent
Distress and discomfort Deception Debriefing Alternative perspectives |
Ethics in Research
|
|
observe and assess a phenomenon without manipulating variables
|
descriptive research
|
|
looking for associations – but saying nothing about causation
|
correlational research
|
|
looking for cause and effect – field and laboratory
|
experimental designs
|
|
A set of statistical procedures used to review a body of evidence by combining the results of individual studies to measure the overall reliability and strength of particular effects
|
meta analysis
|
|
the extent to which the measures used in a study measure the variables they were designed to measure
|
construct validity
|
|
• people connected by common descent – distinct ethnic ‘stock’; distinguished one population from another – usually based on visible traits (skin color; hair, facial features), genes and self-identification
|
race
|
|
• a person’s sense of cultural and historical identity and affiliation, a shared cultural heritage, national characteristics, religion, and language – based on race – or descent from common ancestors
|
ethnicity
|
|
socio-cultural dimensions of being male or female
|
gender
|
|
An amalgam of who we think we are…values; priorities; attitudes; and beliefs
|
the self-concept
|
|
“…mental templates by which we organize our worlds” (Myers, 2003, p 41)
|
self schemas
|
|
William James
the self-as-known (object) – one can describe the self – can be described – including physical traits, possessions, personality characteristics, social roles (multiple social selves), relationships, thoughts and feelings and spirituality |
the "me"
|
|
William James
the self as knower (subject) - the sense of agency; of uniqueness; the sense of continuity from moment to moment; an awareness of one’s own awareness |
the "i"
|
|
“…patterns of past behavior, as well as patterns for one’s current and future behavior, and described by two broad modes of being – an independent __________ and an interdependent ___________
|
self construals
|
|
the enduring sense of self
|
personal self
|
|
or collection of selves – defined by context
|
social self
|
|
defined within relationships - family, friends, work
|
relational self
|
|
temperament, reactivity; innate tendencies (e.g. Eysenck concept of introversion-extraversion)
|
biological self
|
|
argues that people know who thy are by observing their own behavior
|
self-perception theory
|
|
describes people whose childhood experiences taught them that they have no control over their destiny
|
learned helplessness
|
|
a sense of confidence that one can perform the behaviors that are demanded in a specific situation
|
self-efficacy
|
|
describes the degree to which a person sites control in themselves or in chance, luck or fate – as a product of their early experience
|
locus of control
|
|
where a person identifies with a social group and categorizes themselves as a member of that group – and adopts the stereotypical behavior and persona expected of members of that group
|
self-sterotyping
|
|
proposes that people’s individual psychological processes (including, crucially, their identities) are transformed in group settings.
|
social identity theory
|
|
the self as insightful, shrewd and intuitive, self-aware and self-monitoring
|
reflexive
|
|
the self as part of a shared system of meaning
|
connected
|
|
the self as always in a state of ‘being in the world’ – where there is no separation between the person and the situation
|
situated in the world
|
|
the self as purposeful and strategic – according to what is at stake in any given situation
|
intentional
|
|
the self as understood or seen through presencing practices – ie where some kind of social reality is made real
|
the product of presencing practices
|
|
the self as a product of common impressions, symbols, ideas, and understanding shared by people rather than being products of individual minds
|
intersubjective self
|
|
one in which the person adopts highly rigid views which are strongly prejudiced
|
Adorno's authoritarian personality
|
|
an approach that underlines the importance of context in the way that people perceive objects – particularly the ideas of figure and ground
|
gestalt psychology
|
|
• People absorb information
• Interpret it in relation to their experience and knowledge • Store it as an interpreted memory |
cognitive schemas
|
|
How we explain behavior in terms of internal dispositions or external circumstance
|
attribution theory
|
|
tendency for observers to underestimate situational influences and overestimate dispositional influences
|
fundamental attribution error
|
|
a figure/ground phenomenon – the central focus in observation is the person
|
actor-observer bias
|
|
a conscious state of self-focus therefore heightened sensitivity to our own attributes
|
self-awareness
|
|
individualistic versus collectivist
|
culturally conditioned
|
|
explicit, reflective, conscious
|
controlled
|
|
implicit – effortless, without awareness e.g. schematic connections; emotional reactions; heuristics
|
automatic
|
|
the tendency to be more confident than correct
|
overconfidence phenomeon
|
|
a tendency to perceive relationships where none exists
|
illusory relationships
|
|
an inflated sense of our own control over situations
|
illusory control
|
|
primarily a theory about hoe individuals build up and use ‘personal constructs’ to make sense of and operate within the social world
|
personal construct theory
|
|
we hold onto established beliefs regardless of contradictory information
|
belief perseverance
|
|
we are vulnerable to the ‘priming’ effect – what William James called ‘waking of associations
|
the misinformation effect
|
|
assumes our behavior aims to create a desired impression
|
self-presentation theory
|
|
the tension that arises when we experience two inconsistent cognitions – to reduce the unpleasant feeling – we adjust our thinking
|
cognitive dissonance theory
|
|
we make inferences about who we are based on observations of what we do
|
self-perception theory
|
|
when there is less social pressure around expression of attitudes the relationship is strengthened
|
social desirability pressure
|
|
Specific, relevant attitudes predict behavior
|
specificity and relevance
|
|
An attitude predicts behavior when it is potent
|
power of the attitude
|
|
including position and salience, master statuses – and their relation to the feelings and behavior
|
structure of social identity
|
|
including self enhancement/esteem; existential needs (a ‘coherent self-conception’); control; self-knowledge
|
function of social identity
|
|
a period of free experimentation before a final identity is achieved
|
psychosocial moratorium
|
|
“…the acquisition of a set of beliefs, attitudes, and values about oneself as a man or a woman in many areas of social life, including intimate relations, family, work, community, and religion.”
|
gender identity
|
|
• The child’s knowledge of gender roles shapes their preferences and behavior.
• Parental influence is complex. • As children learn the rules of gender they begin to establish gender-linked cognitive schemas (Bem 1981). • Gender rules become more established with age. • Girls continue to be more flexible with gender rules. • Children with multiple classification skills are also more flexible. • Children of non-traditional parents are also more flexible. |
learning gender role standards
|
|
• How closely your attributes and skills approximate the gender the role standard
• How much the child likes the same sex parent • The perceived cultural value of each sex |
gender preferences influences
|
|
…the child identifies with the same sex parent- via the castration complex and the resolution of the Oedipal complex – difficult to test empirically and to a large extent rejected as marginalizing women.
|
psychoanalytic theory
|
|
learning through observation and modeling
|
social learning theory
|
|
sex-role typing follows naturally and inevitably from universal principles of cognitive development
|
cognitive development theory
|
|
“… proposes that sex typing derives in large measure from gender-schematic processing, from a generalized readiness on the part of the child to encode and to organize information …according to the culture’s definition of maleness and femaleness”
|
gender schema theory
|
|
“…a cognitive structure, a network of associations that organizes and guides an individual’s perception.” An “anticipatory structure” Bem (1983 p 603) – “entails a readiness to sort information into categories on the basis of some particular dimension”
|
schema
|
|
“…the child…learns to encode and to organize information in terms of the evolving gender schema.”
|
gender schematic processing
|
|
“…sex-typed individuals are seen to differ from other individuals not primarily in the degree of femininity or masculinity they possess, but in the extent to which their self-concepts and behaviors are organized on the basis of gender rather than on the basis of some other dimension.” p 605
|
sex typing
|
|
“…a component of ongoing interactions in which perceivers emit expectancies, targets (selves) negotiate their own identities, and the context in which interaction occurs shapes the resultant behavior.” p 369
|
gender in 'context'
|
|
• The ‘perceiver’ interprets the targets behavior – often in line with expectations and regardless of confirmation
• The target interprets his/her behavior – and may internalize that interpretation – “In effect, the target person has become the person the perceiver expected.” |
the working self concept
|
|
A breeding stock of animals; a family, tribe, people or nation belonging to the same stock
|
stock as a defintion for race
|
|
[the] differential concentration of gene frequencies responsible for traits which….are confined to physical manifestations such as skin color or hair form
|
gene 'frequencies' as a definition for race
|
|
Shared physical characteristics, along with area of geographic origin and shared culture
|
physical characteristics as a definition for race
|
|
when discussing or assessing race-related processes at an interpersonal level
|
sociorace
|
|
to refer to intraphysic dynamics assumed to result form racial socialization
|
psychorace
|
|
specific norms, values, attitudes that distinguish that group
|
culture
|
|
including strength of identification; personal, social and political salience; the developmental changes
|
ethnic identity
|
|
some ethnicities are more equal than others
|
minority status
|
|
inequality – socio-economic and political
|
cultural/ethnicity self-esteem
|
|
‘race salience and value’ describes the importance of race at this stage – characterized by “miseducation and self-hatred”
|
pre-encounter/anti-black
|
|
characterized by the adoption of a pro-American or mainstream identity
|
pre-encounter/assimilation
|
|
– a reiteration of original model - a “single event” or a “series of small eye-opening events”
|
encounter
|
|
now can be pro-Black and/or anti-White
The stage is resolved when the heightened emotion of this period is brought under control |
immersion/emersion
|
|
now collapsed into one stage – with 3 internalized (comfortable) identities
• Black Nationalist – being Black is the only salient identity - expressed through social/political action • Biculturalist – incorporates two identities – typically a sense of “Blackness” fused with American values • Multiculturalist – includes a matrix of 3 or more cultural frames of reference |
internalization/commitment
|
|
group with short term minimal involvement
|
incidental group
|
|
group with typically prolonged contact; a shared commitment; common goals
|
membership group
|
|
group with identification; group affiliation; self-categorization; a frame of reference for a person’s social identity
|
identity reference group
|
|
the ‘mere presence’ hypothesis – e.g. social categorization and the selective allocation of resources; idling or energizing
|
the minimal group paradigm
|
|
Differentiation on the basis of group membership is essentially competitive – either on the level of broad social comparison or ‘realistic’ competition involving incompatible group goals – often based on the distribution of finite resources
|
social comparison
|
|
(inhibition) – the tendency to exert less effort toward a common goal
|
social loafing
|
|
(facilitation) – the strengthening of dominant responses in the presence of other
|
social energizing
|
|
• The conservative nature of groups (Allport 1924)
• The ‘autokinetic effect’ – converging to the mean (Sherif 1936) • Group norms |
conformity
|
|
“…the shared standards of conduct expected of group members.” – both explicit and implicit (Stainton Rogers, p. 272)
|
group norms
|
|
• …in group settings they use the judgements of others in the group as a source of reliable information.”
|
informational mode of influence
|
|
“…people follow the norms of the group.”
|
normative influence
|
|
• Loss of awareness and evaluation apprehension
• Particularly in a group situation that fosters responsiveness to group norms • Influenced by – anonymity; group size; in a situation of diminished self awareness |
deindividuation
|
|
“…the tendency of group decisions to be more extreme than the mean of the individual decisions made by the group members.”
|
polarization
|
|
focuses on people’s desire for social approval and avoidance of social censure –members try to align themselves with the group position.
|
social comparison theory
|
|
(also informational influence theory) (Burnstein and Vinokur, 1977) highlights the capacity for novel arguments to change people’s opinions.
|
persuasive arguement theory
|
|
highlights people’s tendency to identify with the group – to see it as an in-group and then seek to endorse its particular norms, rules etc specifically in relation to the out-group.
|
self-catergorization theory
|
|
what happens when a small, highly cohesive group of like-minded people becomes so obsessed with reaching consensus that they loose touch with reality and make a catastrophic decision.”
|
groupthink
|