- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
28 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Define quantitative research
|
- Empirical research where the data are numerical
- Formal, objective, systematic (applies to all kinds of research) process in which numerical data are untilized to obtain info about the world |
|
Characteristics of quantitative research
|
- Explicit research questions/hypotheses
- Limited interactions with particpants - More structured process: close-ended questions - Researchers objective, impartial role - May be projectable to a broad population - Complements qualitative data |
|
Observation defined
|
-Observation of animate (consumer behavior) or inanimate objects (TV commecials, e.g. content analysis)
- Examines overt, accessible behaviors - Research TECHNIQUE and can be qualitative or quantitative |
|
Dimensions of observation
|
- Type of situation: natural (frequent, easily accessible events in a real world setting) vs. contrived (events prompted in an artificial setting)
- Observer obtrusiveness: obtrusive (open, known presence) vs. disguised (unknown presence) - Form of data recording: structured (quantitative checklist) vs. unstructured (qualitative descriptions) |
|
Pros of observation
|
- May be the only method feasible
- Useful for determining "how" - Does not rely on a consumer's willingness to dive desired data |
|
Cons of observation
|
- Potential incorrect inferefence or selective observation by the researcher
- High cost and time-consuming for infrequent events - Unable to measure "why" (motivations, beliefs, attitudes) - Data is open to misinterpretation |
|
Physiological research defined
|
- Voluntary responses: eye tracking
- Involuntary responses (emotional responses): brain waves, Galvanic skin responses, voice pitch |
|
Pros of physiological reserach
|
Probably the most objective data
|
|
Cons of physiological research
|
- Special training and facility necessary
- Involuntary responses: intensity, but not direction - Rarely used independently |
|
Pros of personal interviews (mail intercept or pre-recruited)
|
- Highest quality of data
- Useful for a long, complex questionnaire -Visual stimuli can be used |
|
Cons of personal interviews
|
- True random sample and generalizability are not feasible
- Highly trained interviewers - Expensive, time-consuming |
|
Pros of telephone interviews(trained interviewers telephoning from a central location; becoming more cost-efficient)
|
- Marginal costs for multiple contacts
- Useful for interviews with complex skip patterns - True random sample and generalizability are feasible |
|
Cons of telephone interviews
|
- Must be short
- Questionnaire cannot be complex - Difficult to collect sensitive data - High resfusal rate - No visual stimuli |
|
Pros of mail surveys (random sample or panel)
|
- Cost-efficient per completed survey
- Useful for sensitive data - Respondent convenience |
|
Cons of mail surveys
|
- Extended timing of data collection
- Low response rate - Limited questionnaire length and complexity |
|
Pros of Web surveys (mix of personal interviews and mail surveys)
|
- Cost-efficient per completed survey
- Respondent convenience - Useful for sensitive data - Useful for interviews with complex skip patterns - Adaptive to responses |
|
Cons of Web surveys
|
- Low response rate
- Extended timing of data collection - Special programming skills necessary - True random sample and generalizability are not feasible |
|
Cost: highest to lowest
|
- Personal interview
- Telephone interviews: 1/4 to 1/2 as much as personal interview - Mail and Web surveys (free to e-mail) are cost-efficient per completed survey |
|
Timing requirements: longest to shortest
|
- Mail surveys: mailing, processing and delivery, completion, processing and delievery, etc.
- Personal and Web surveys almost always slower than telephone; faster or slower than mail depending on sample size (increase in sample = increase in time) - Telephone surveys: all training and coordinatino can be performed at a central facility; teams of interviewers can work simultaneously |
|
Sample control: definition; listing from greatest to least
|
Defnition: extent to which a researcher can control who responds
- Personal and telephone interviews: personal contact and immediate nature ensures that respondent is part of sample - Mail and Web: no assurance that the person to whom the survey is directed is the one who completes it |
|
Interview control: definition; listing from greatest to least
|
Definition: extent of control a researcher has over the circumstances in which a respndent provides his or her answers to the survey
- Personal and telephone: interviewer can make sure that respondent participates and answer appropriately - Web surveys: software can lead respondents through survey properly, but no guarantee that respondent has read everything - Mail survey: no assurance that respondent will read necessary material, answer propertly |
|
Administrative control: definition; greatest to least
|
Definition: extent to which a researcer is able to monitor interviewer quality
- Telephone surveys: supervisors can monitor interviewers -Web: computer program ensures that questionnaire is given same way every time - Personal interview: supervisor cannot monitor every interview -Mail: N/A |
|
Sample characteristics: greatest to least sensitivity to demographic and socioeconomic differences
|
- Mail: race, ethnicity, education, socioeconomic status affect participation
- Personal and telephone: participation rates among subsamples are generally equal |
|
Accuracy: definition; most to least
|
Definition: degree to which the data collected in the research study is free of errors
- Telephone and mail: respondents more candid, likely to reveal personal info - Web: respondents somewhat likely to give personal info - Personal interviews: better for collecting complete and considered responses |
|
Topic complexity
|
- Personal interview
- Telephone interviews: difficult to collect sensitive data; useful for complex skip patterns - Mail surveys: Useful for sensitive data; good for simple topics - Web surveys: useful for sensitive data; hard to answer open-ended questions |
|
Questionnaire complexity
|
- Personal interview: good for long, complex questionnaire
- Web: relatively high level of complexity - Telephone: simple questions, especially when dealing with verbal complexity - Mail: limited questionnaire length and complexity |
|
Interview length
|
- Personal interview: face-to-face nature allows interviewer to keep respondent interested
- Mail surveys: long ones are visually overwhelming, time-consuming - Telephone surveys compete with other home and business activities - Web surveys: time-consuming |
|
Response rate: high to low
|
-Personal interview: face-to-face contact makes respondents answers
-Telephone interview: interactive nature ensures answers - Mail surveys - Web surveys: less accountability |