- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
68 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Rational Method
|
Reasoning through logic. There exists other ways of understanding the world than through observation and/or experience. DEDUCTIVE REASONING
|
|
Scientific Method
|
Using observations and measurements to acquire knowledge
|
|
Empirical cycle
|
Problem/observation, Induction, Theory, Deduction, Hypothesis, Research design, Measurement methods, Sampling method, Data collection, data analysis, induction
|
|
Deduction
|
Coming from experience/ observations --> deriving a hypothesis
|
|
Induction
|
Taking a theory and using it to explain observations
|
|
Causality necessitates :
|
3 factors:
1) Covariation: if cause is present, effect is present; if cause is absent, effect is absent 2) Correct time order: cause before effect 3) Non spuriousness: no confounding variable that explains the relationship between cause and effect |
|
Concepts
|
an abstract representation of an object or one of its properties or a behavioral phenomenon
|
|
Conceptual definition
|
explaining a concept by using another concept
|
|
Ostensive definition
|
explaining a concept by pointing at it
|
|
Operational definition
|
defining a process through which the quantity of the concept is measured. i.e Intelligence--> GPA
|
|
Discrete variable
|
a variable that cannot take on all values within the limit of the variable.
|
|
Continuous variable
|
A variable that can take on all values
|
|
Concomitant variation
|
Direction: positive : if value of a increases, so does value of b
negative: if value of a increases, value of b decreases Magnitude of correlation: strength of covariation Nature: linear/non-linear, causal consequential, spurious |
|
Control variable:
|
a variable that we measure (and hold constant) to test whether a relationship is spurious
|
|
Confounding variable
|
3rd variable which explains the relationship between 2 variables
|
|
Causation
|
Smoking causes cancer
|
|
Correlation
|
Smoking and alcholism are correlated
|
|
Criterion
|
Effect
|
|
Predictor
|
Cause
|
|
Variable
|
characteristics which vary from subject to subject, from time to time
|
|
Observable variable
|
Tangible. sex height, dead alive, market price of a product
|
|
Independent variable
|
a variable whose values are chosen and set by the experimenter. This variable is manipulated to examine the impact on the dependent variable
|
|
Dependent variable
|
The variable outcome, results, criterion. The variable of interest that is measured as a function of the Xs on the Ys
|
|
Control variable
|
A variable that is related to the outcome, which influences it. Its influence needs to be controlled
|
|
Extraneous variable
|
a variable which is related to the variable (independent/dependent) but is not part of the experiment. Nevertheless, it needs to be accounted and adjusted for
|
|
Moderator
|
A variable that regulates the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable
|
|
Nominal
|
Used to compare. You need to identify and classify
|
|
Ordinal
|
Used to determine preferences. greater/less.
|
|
Interval
|
Used to determine number of intervals or differences. You need to find differences, distances
|
|
Ratio
|
Used to compare ratios.
You need to find fractions and multiples of the ratios. |
|
Internal validity
|
the ability of a research design to test adequately the hypotheses it was designed to test
|
|
Threats to internal validity
|
Confounding, Biased selection of subjects, History, Maturation, Testing, instrumentation, regression to the mean, experimental mortality
|
|
Biased selection of subjects
|
the subjects in the treatment and control group already differ on the dependent
variable prior to the treatment |
|
History
|
Events that occured during time lapse between pretest and posttest which could have affected results
|
|
Maturation
|
Regular changes due to passage of time.
|
|
Instrumentation
|
Shifting of the measuring instrument independent of any change in the phenomenon measured
|
|
Regression to the mean
|
Phenomenon that takes place when a variable is extreme. The second measurement will thus be closer to the average, paradoxical phenomenon
|
|
Experimental mortality
|
Loss of follow-up
|
|
External validity
|
Generalizability of the results
|
|
Statistical conclusion validity
|
There needs to be a secure amount of variables to ensure that a relationship is truly present
|
|
True Experiment
|
Always randomization and control group
|
|
Parallel group designs
|
Each group receives one treatment A or B. Results are compared
|
|
Factorial Design
|
A design involving 2 or more factors (independent variables). Adding factors enables the experimenter to analyze each effect on the independent variable.
|
|
Simple effect
|
They look at the effect of a particular independent variable on a specific dependent variable
|
|
Main effect
|
Average amount of punishment on attractive and unattractive people
|
|
Interaction
|
Combination of effects of independent variables on dependent variable
|
|
Cross-over designs
|
Each subject receives a random medication in a random sequence, then receives the other medication. Receives both , CROSSES OVER
|
|
Quasi-Experimental Research designs
|
No random assignment
|
|
Pre experiment
|
No control grop
|
|
Cross-sectional studies
|
Data is collected at one point in time
|
|
Prospective studies
|
Subjects are first identified and then followed as time passes
|
|
Trend study
|
General population followed
|
|
Panel study
|
Type of prospective study where individuals are followed
|
|
Cohort study
|
People who share common starting point followed
|
|
Cohort sequential design
|
adjacent segments of limited longitudinal data on a specific cohort can be linked together with other cohorts to determine the common developpent of a trend. These designs allow reserachers to study individual development over a long interval of the life course
|
|
Retrospective studies
|
Study that looks backward in time. i.e. finding out why a person died
|
|
Case-control study
|
Comparing subjects with outcome (disease) and without outcomes (no disease)
|
|
Retrospective cohort study
|
Cohort is formed based on past information
|
|
Ecological studies
|
Study of individuals, groups, organizations, social interactions
|
|
Ecological fallacy
|
inferring something about an individual based on a group result
|
|
Reductionism fallacy
|
Inferring something about groups based on individual information
|
|
Qualitative research designs
|
Particular design in social sciences that fundamentally depends on watching people in their own territory and interaction with them in their own language on their own terms.
AIM : description, illustration, explanation, exploration |
|
Grounded theory
|
Used when there is no information or theory on the subject that can be useful to derive from. It consists of a lot of collection and analysis of data during research process. AIM: identify phenomena and its changes in time
|
|
Phenomenology
|
Involves understanding a lived human experience. AIM: to discover and describe a phenomenon by analyzing situation.
|
|
Ethnography
|
watching and listening to derive a meaning of an observed behavior inductively. AIM: to describe, interpret, understand a social structure of a culture
|
|
Narrative Research
|
Exploring individual stories to describe the lives of people
|
|
Case study research
|
Exploring a system of individuals to describe a case
|
|
Control group
|
A variable that we measure (and hold constant) to test whether a relationship is spurious
|