• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

PLAY BUTTON

image

Progress

1/31

Click to flip

31 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Marbury v. Madison
- established the principle of judicial review
- stregthen power of judicial
- by giving s.c authority to declare acts unconst
McCulloch v. Maryland
-Confirmed right of Congress to utilize implied powerd to carry out enumerated powers
- validated supremacy of nat gov over state, declaring state cannot interfere with or tax activities of fed gov.
Gibbons v. Ogden
- stregthen power of fed gov to regualte interstate commerce
- established commerce clause as key for xpansion of fed power
Engel v. Vitale
- struck down state-sponserd prayer in public school
- ruled reagents prayer unconst violate establishment clause
Lemon v. Kurtzman
- struck down state fund for priv religous schls.
- sate aid to church schls meet 3test. 1) purpse of aid clearly secular.2) gov action cnt adv nor inhibit relig. 3) gov cnt foster an entanglment btween gov and religion.
Reynolds v. US
-banned polygamy
- distinguished btwen relig belifes prtcted by Free exercise clasue, and relig prac that may be restricted
- ruled relig prac cant make an act legal tht was already illegal
Organ v. Smith
- Banned use of illegal drugs in relig ceremonies
- ruled gov can act whn relig prac violate criminal laws
Schenck v. US
-ruled free speach can be limited whn presents "clear and preasent danger"
- condit undr which pub authrties cn limit free spch
New York Times v. Sullivan
- ruled tht pub officals cant win a suit for defamation, unlss is made w/ "actual malice"
-"actual malice" stndrd to prmote "uninhibited, robust, wide open" pub debate
Roth v. USA
- ruled obscenity not const prtectd free speech
- created "prevailing community standards"rule requiring a considertion of wrk as whole
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent school district
- prtected some frms of symbolic speech
- ruled students dont "shed their const rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
- const rights apply in school
Texas v. Johnson
- ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by 1st amendment
Barronv. Baltimore (1833)
- ruled that the BoR CANT be applied to the states
Gitlow v. New york (1925)
- establlished precedent for the doctrine of selective incorporation
- ths extendng most requiremnts of BoR to states
mapp v. Ohio
- extended EXLUSIONARY RULE, to states
- illustrated selective incorp thrgh the DUE PROCESS CLAUSE of 14th amend
Weeks v. USA
- established exlusionary rule in FEDERAL CASES
- prohibited evidence obtained illegally from bieng admitted in court
Gideon v. Wainwright
- ruled 6th amend(right to council) prvsions applies to accused of major crimes under state laws
- 6th amend applied to states thrgh DUE PROCESS CLAUSE of 14th amend
Miranda v. Arizona
- ruled plice must inform crimnal suspcts of const rights before QUESTIONING suspects after arrest
- police must read Miranda rules to crimnal suspects
Dred Scott v. Sandford
- ruled African americans not citezens, thus could not petition in S.C court
- overturned by 14th amend
Plessy v. Ferguson
- upheld jim crow laws, segragation
- "seperate but equal" public facilities for african americans
Dred Scott v. Sandford
- ruled African americans not citezens, thus could not petition in S.C court
- overturned by 14th amend
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka
- racially segregated schools violated equal protection clasue of 14th amend
- reversed principle of plessy v ferguson
Regents of the University of California V. Bakke
- orderd medical schll to admti Bakke
- medical school strict quota denied Bakke the equall protct 14th
- race could be used as ONE FACTOR among others for admittance
Grutter v. Bollinger
- upheld affirmative action policy
- upheld Bakke ruling tht race could be a consideration, but QUOTAS ARE ILLGAL
Griswold v. Connecticut
- ruled that a CT law criminilizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy
- important precedent for Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade
- ruled that decision to obtain abortion is protected by right to privacy implied by BoR
Baker V. Carr
- ruled that judicial brnch of gov cna rule on matters of legislative apportionment
- "one person, one vote"
- orderd state legis districts be as equall as possible
Wesberry v. Sanders
- "one person, one vote" in drawging congressional districts
- tirggerd widespread redistricting that gave cities and suburbs greatr represen in Congress
Korematu v. USA
- upheld the consttionality of the relocation of Jap americans as a wartime necessity
- viewed as a flagrant violation of civil liberties
USA v. Nixon
- ruled no Constitional gurantee of UNQUALIFIEd EXECUTIVE PRIVLAGE
Buckley v. Valeo
- upheld federal limits on campaign contributions
- strck down FEC act limiting amount of money indiv can contribute to campaign
- ruled spending money on ones camp. prtcted as freedom of speech
-complicated congrssional efforts to enact signif campain finance reform