- Shuffle
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Alphabetize
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Front First
Toggle OnToggle Off
- Both Sides
Toggle OnToggle Off
Front
How to study your flashcards.
Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key
Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key
H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
PLAY BUTTON
![]()
31 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Marbury v. Madison
|
- established the principle of judicial review
- stregthen power of judicial - by giving s.c authority to declare acts unconst |
|
McCulloch v. Maryland
|
-Confirmed right of Congress to utilize implied powerd to carry out enumerated powers
- validated supremacy of nat gov over state, declaring state cannot interfere with or tax activities of fed gov. |
|
Gibbons v. Ogden
|
- stregthen power of fed gov to regualte interstate commerce
- established commerce clause as key for xpansion of fed power |
|
Engel v. Vitale
|
- struck down state-sponserd prayer in public school
- ruled reagents prayer unconst violate establishment clause |
|
Lemon v. Kurtzman
|
- struck down state fund for priv religous schls.
- sate aid to church schls meet 3test. 1) purpse of aid clearly secular.2) gov action cnt adv nor inhibit relig. 3) gov cnt foster an entanglment btween gov and religion. |
|
Reynolds v. US
|
-banned polygamy
- distinguished btwen relig belifes prtcted by Free exercise clasue, and relig prac that may be restricted - ruled relig prac cant make an act legal tht was already illegal |
|
Organ v. Smith
|
- Banned use of illegal drugs in relig ceremonies
- ruled gov can act whn relig prac violate criminal laws |
|
Schenck v. US
|
-ruled free speach can be limited whn presents "clear and preasent danger"
- condit undr which pub authrties cn limit free spch |
|
New York Times v. Sullivan
|
- ruled tht pub officals cant win a suit for defamation, unlss is made w/ "actual malice"
-"actual malice" stndrd to prmote "uninhibited, robust, wide open" pub debate |
|
Roth v. USA
|
- ruled obscenity not const prtectd free speech
- created "prevailing community standards"rule requiring a considertion of wrk as whole |
|
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent school district
|
- prtected some frms of symbolic speech
- ruled students dont "shed their const rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." - const rights apply in school |
|
Texas v. Johnson
|
- ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by 1st amendment
|
|
Barronv. Baltimore (1833)
|
- ruled that the BoR CANT be applied to the states
|
|
Gitlow v. New york (1925)
|
- establlished precedent for the doctrine of selective incorporation
- ths extendng most requiremnts of BoR to states |
|
mapp v. Ohio
|
- extended EXLUSIONARY RULE, to states
- illustrated selective incorp thrgh the DUE PROCESS CLAUSE of 14th amend |
|
Weeks v. USA
|
- established exlusionary rule in FEDERAL CASES
- prohibited evidence obtained illegally from bieng admitted in court |
|
Gideon v. Wainwright
|
- ruled 6th amend(right to council) prvsions applies to accused of major crimes under state laws
- 6th amend applied to states thrgh DUE PROCESS CLAUSE of 14th amend |
|
Miranda v. Arizona
|
- ruled plice must inform crimnal suspcts of const rights before QUESTIONING suspects after arrest
- police must read Miranda rules to crimnal suspects |
|
Dred Scott v. Sandford
|
- ruled African americans not citezens, thus could not petition in S.C court
- overturned by 14th amend |
|
Plessy v. Ferguson
|
- upheld jim crow laws, segragation
- "seperate but equal" public facilities for african americans |
|
Dred Scott v. Sandford
|
- ruled African americans not citezens, thus could not petition in S.C court
- overturned by 14th amend |
|
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka
|
- racially segregated schools violated equal protection clasue of 14th amend
- reversed principle of plessy v ferguson |
|
Regents of the University of California V. Bakke
|
- orderd medical schll to admti Bakke
- medical school strict quota denied Bakke the equall protct 14th - race could be used as ONE FACTOR among others for admittance |
|
Grutter v. Bollinger
|
- upheld affirmative action policy
- upheld Bakke ruling tht race could be a consideration, but QUOTAS ARE ILLGAL |
|
Griswold v. Connecticut
|
- ruled that a CT law criminilizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy
- important precedent for Roe v. Wade |
|
Roe v. Wade
|
- ruled that decision to obtain abortion is protected by right to privacy implied by BoR
|
|
Baker V. Carr
|
- ruled that judicial brnch of gov cna rule on matters of legislative apportionment
- "one person, one vote" - orderd state legis districts be as equall as possible |
|
Wesberry v. Sanders
|
- "one person, one vote" in drawging congressional districts
- tirggerd widespread redistricting that gave cities and suburbs greatr represen in Congress |
|
Korematu v. USA
|
- upheld the consttionality of the relocation of Jap americans as a wartime necessity
- viewed as a flagrant violation of civil liberties |
|
USA v. Nixon
|
- ruled no Constitional gurantee of UNQUALIFIEd EXECUTIVE PRIVLAGE
|
|
Buckley v. Valeo
|
- upheld federal limits on campaign contributions
- strck down FEC act limiting amount of money indiv can contribute to campaign - ruled spending money on ones camp. prtcted as freedom of speech -complicated congrssional efforts to enact signif campain finance reform |