Home Page
1. What Is Billy Wrong And What's Wrong With His Claim?

1. What Is Billy Wrong And What's Wrong With His Claim?

Improved Essays

Show More

Jennifer,

I completely agree with you and how Billy is wrong with his claim. Since the FTC has obtained proof by aerial photography, there is no violation of the constitution because no warrant is required for observation by the public. All the proof they obtained by aerial photography is valid and can be used against Billy. A subpoena to testify or to produce records cannot be opposed because it is a search and seizure. A significant difference between an agency hearing and a court hearing is that there is no right of trial by jury before an agency. Therefore, Billy has no right to a jury trial.

Related Documents

Improved Essays
Dmak Dbq Analysis
- 580 Words
- 3 Pages
Dmak Dbq Analysis

A thermal scanner was used on the house of DLK without a warrant, in order to obtain evidence that DLK was illegally growing marijuana. DLK sued on the grounds that the scan was a search, and since there was no warrant, it violated his fourth amendment right. The government went too far by scanning DLK’s house because the scan indicated things about the house that would be unknown unless one entered the house, revealed things which DLK wished to keep private and took reasonable measures to protect, and was a violation of privacy. Thermal scanners indicate things about the house that would not be unknown unless one entered the house. They can show vents, rooms, and insulation abnormalities through heat build up.…
- 580 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Barenblatt V. S. 360 USmmary
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Barenblatt V. S. 360 USmmary

Barenblatt v U.S. 360 U.S. 109 (1959) Facts A case readdressing the HUAC committee. In 1953 the HUAC subcommittee initiated hearings to “ascertain the character, extent and objects of Communist Party activities” carried out by teachers who are the “subject to the directive and discipline of the Communist party.” One of those called to testify before the committee was Francis X. T. Crowley, who admitted being a member of a club tied to the communist party while a graduate student at the University of Michigan and named Lloyd Barenblatt as a member of the club as well.…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Gideon V Wainwright Case Study
- 1434 Words
- 6 Pages
Gideon V Wainwright Case Study

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 vote that the evidence was illegally obtained and thus could not be used in the court of…
- 1434 Words
- 6 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Case Study: Wolfish V. Metropolitan Correctional Center
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Case Study: Wolfish V. Metropolitan Correctional Center

FACTS: Along with the other defendants, Wolfish brought this case to the Supreme Court claiming that the conditions in which they were in prior to their trial violated constitutional protections. Each of the defendants were all confined at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City. They claimed that the double-bunking, which meant two inmates within a room only built and furnished for one, no reading materials, no packages or mail allowed from the outside, body-cavity searches, and that they were forced to stay outside of their cell during searches was unconstitutional. Since the Metropolitan Correctional Center is a federal facility, they brought the charges against the U.S. and Attorney General Griffin Bell.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Markus Fleenor's Arguments
- 2058 Words
- 9 Pages
Markus Fleenor's Arguments

Markus Fleenor [Upload on the Assignments Page as an attachment ] The test covers both the material in the text book as well as the Instructor’s Comments. Always give specific, historical examples to justify your arguments. Read and follow the directions for each question carefully.…
- 2058 Words
- 9 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Roy Olmstead Case Summary
- 977 Words
- 4 Pages
Roy Olmstead Case Summary

Due to the issue with the garnering of the evidence in the case, the 5th Amendment cannot be applied to this case without first proving the 4th Amendment had been violated. The general purpose of the 4th Amendment was to protect citizens from being subjected to governmental searches of their house and their physical possessions against their will. The protection of the 4th Amendment only extends to protecting the physical domains of citizens property from being subjected to search and seizures. The evidence obtained against Roy Olmstead was gathered through the sense of hearing which prevented the need to physically enter upon or handle any of Olmstead’s property. Citizens who used telephones were projecting their voices to entities outside of their home domain and therefore not within protection of the 4th Amendment.…
- 977 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Who Is Richard Nixon's Executive Privilege?
- 1846 Words
- 8 Pages
Who Is Richard Nixon's Executive Privilege?

On July 17, 1972, following Richard Nixon’s election members of his staff were caught stealing from the Democratic National Committee office located in the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C.. This case went to court because the prosecutor wanted to prove that Nixon knew about the scandal and was covering up the incident. They hoped to gain the tapes and documents from the Oval Office. The question the United States Supreme Court was tasked with answering was if the President’s right to safeguard certain information, using his “Executive Privilege” confidentiality power, make them entirely immune from judicial review.…
- 1846 Words
- 8 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
How Did The Patriot Act Violate Civil Liberties
- 1465 Words
- 6 Pages
How Did The Patriot Act Violate Civil Liberties

This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act).…
- 1465 Words
- 6 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Fair Due Process Essay
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Fair Due Process Essay

• Are due process issues (remember them?) involved when an agency engages in administrative adjudication? Due process issues are involved when an agency engages in administrative adjudication. The case of Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission is an example of a federal agency in this case the FTC violating Cinderella’s constitutional right of due process given to them through the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. • What kind of due process issues? In the same example, Cinderella pointed out the FTC’s failure to provide them with fair due process.…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Moot Court Case
- 1647 Words
- 7 Pages
Moot Court Case

DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…
- 1647 Words
- 7 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Violate The Fourth Amendment
- 80 Words
- 1 Pages
Violate The Fourth Amendment

I'm confused, but in this case, I consider that the police seemed to violate the Fourth Amendment, which enforces to guard the citizen's privacy rights and restricts the police against unreasonable searches and seizures. As a result, the drugs seized at Jim's house should not be used as evidence to convict him. It is the duty of the police department to update their databases often to avoid such situations. In addition, they must ensure all searches and arrests are legal.…
- 80 Words
- 1 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
The Fourth Amendment: Search And Seizure
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
The Fourth Amendment: Search And Seizure

As it states in the Fourth Amendment “A search or seizure is generally unreasonable and illegal without a warrant” (Cornell University Law School). Law enforcement, with the aid of a subpoena, can conduct a warrantless search only if it falls under circumstances where obtaining one would be illogical. The U.S. government loosely defines these circumstances and the meaning of relevancy. If property is, as Sensenbrenner states in his letter, “relevant to an authorized investigation into international terrorism”, then under section 215 of the Patriot Act the government is able “to apply to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to issue an order for the production of tangible things” (Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder) and law enforcement can conduct a search and seizure. This court order must be relevant to an investigation or goes against the Fourth Amendment.…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
The Importance Of Privacy In The United States
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
The Importance Of Privacy In The United States

By bypassing judges, the agencies have the ability to gather unnecessary information that does not pertain to their investigations. When such irrelevant private information of individuals is viewed or seized, the government is infringing upon the privacy of…
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Warren Blumenfeld's Argument Analysis
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Warren Blumenfeld's Argument Analysis

Warren J. Blumenfeld is a progressive author dedicated to the forward evolution of the United States and its extremely reserved systems. Being a well decorated writer in the Purple press and The Beacon press with modern and progressive articles means that Blumenfeld has a plethora of knowledge when appealing to the reserved audience of The Huffington Post. Using this background serves him well in his opportunity to convey the problems with modern English through his extensive use of logos and ethos. In his argument about modern linguicism, Warren starts off the introduction with a joke his friend from Belgium told him about Americans’ arrogant anti-linguistic culture and their self-righteous beliefs.…
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Gloria Ladson-Billings Argument Analysis
- 1032 Words
- 4 Pages
Gloria Ladson-Billings Argument Analysis

Culturally relevant teaching is addressed in this module. The definition and practical application of culturally relevant teaching serve as the essential questions. In defining culturally relevant teaching, I begin with the work of Gloria Ladson-Billings. Ladson-Billings (1995) suggests that cultural relevant pedagogy consists of three elements: the “ability to develop students academically, willingness to nurture and support cultural competence, and the development of a sociopolitical or critical consciousness” (p. 483). By addressing pedagogical implications, Ladson-Billings is able to situate her argument for culturally relevant teaching in the domain of everyday classroom teaching practice.…
- 1032 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More

Related Topics