Analysis Of Montesquieu's The Spirit Of The Laws

Decent Essays
In The Spirit of The Laws, Montesquieu explains his beliefs for the separation of powers. He believes that there should be three branches of government, instead of one main ruler. He explains that if there was one main ruler, that he could take his powers to the extreme, and the ruler might take his punishments to be violent. He also stated that with the three branches, everyone would get the same treatment because there would be multiple people working on one case.
I agree with Montesquieu with this point. In Spirit of The Laws, he made some excellent points as to why there should be multiple points of government instead of just one king, or ruler. One ruler could have their judgements about a single person and give them a different punishment

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Montesquieu, believed in the division of power in government, that executive power reside in a king, legislative power in a parliament and judicial power in the courts. Montesquieu also believed…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed in doing what was best regardless of the social backlash, so seeing that his own ruler could not do the same was eye-opening. Also, the denial of opposing viewpoints…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many ways that the constitution guarded against tyranny. In 1787 ,fifty five delegates met in philadelphia to fix the articles of confederation. They decided to make a new government, called the constitution, that prevented tyranny. Tyranny is a noun that means a cruel or oppressive government or rule. The constitution prevents dictatorship and tyranny in four ways: federalism, separation of power, small states vs. large states compromise, and checks and balances system.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise To Power Dbq

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is said that his temper caused him to do many things he regretted later in life that effected his society. Through his time of reign, he had began to gain higher ranks and granted with more power. In document six, it suggests that the more in command he became, the more unquestioned and powerful. His attitude sparked many different views on him.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was an another enlightenment thinker. Montesquieu was the one who developed the separation of power. He believed this would help to divide the power amongst everyone, so that one person would not rule. Montesquieu came up with three branches, so that not only a few people would maintain the power. The Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branch.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the assertion, Democracy In America, written by Alexis De Tocqueville, a French diplomat, political scientist, and historian, Tocqueville addresses that we, Americans, do have a political science well-formulated to modern democracy and democratic society, and thus, lacking the necessary tools to effectively understand and manage this new form of government. Tocqueville also suggests democracy and equality are not entirely ‘good things’ as they may leave long-lasting negative impacts in society, to which it may not be necessarily prepared for. In his study, Tocqueville described the movement toward a democratic society and the idea of equality in America to be a universal phenomenon that could not be ceased; in this realization, Tocqueville…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beccaria’s idea, was that the French were trying to make a system of law where everyone would be innocent until proven guilty, which is what we use today. Beccaria tried making the lifestyle ‘terror free,’ where there would be no torture, although the death penalty was still used against some beliefs. Along with Beccaria’s ideals, (Beccaria – Essay on Crimes & Punishments) Emmanuel Joseph Sieyes wrote about “The Third Estate,” which embraces all that which belong to the nation. Even though it may be referred to as a ‘nation,’ the nobles received more freedom than peasants, which was common all around France. This is continued with Beccaria’s ideas, because even though nobles may be treated differently, the punishments are always the same, and so is the theory that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles de Montesquieu was the first to demonstrate the separation of powers in his work L’Esprit des Lois (the Spirit of the Laws) in 1748, he introduced the theory of the separation of powers as a baseline principle (Bondy, 1896). Legal power is separated between those who make laws, those who apply the laws and those who adjudicate on matters of compliance of law. The Judiciary also ensures that the laws are consistent with the powers given to the legislature or executive in accordance with the Constitution. This principle ensures that we are ruled by laws and not the exercise of unchecked executive power. The phrase “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” has become a truism as the concentration of powers in one branch is prone to errors (Civilization of the Political System,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the 18th century, Baron de Montesquieu, a French philosopher, wrote about government in his book, On the Spirit of Laws, that “Power should be a check to power,” meaning that the government should set up power so that it will not be corrupt by separating the government so that each part of it can “block” an action the others can take. All the way across the Atlantic Ocean, five Native American tribes were already making a “checked” government, the Iroquois Confederacy, unknowingly putting Montesquieu’s ideas into practice. The Iroquois Confederacy believed that separating the government is beneficial to their rule and way of life. They (five different tribes) then banded together in a huge group for protection to carry out that idea.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, Enlightened despots endorsed human rights to create a healthier society. Although many enlightened absolutists supported human rights, one of the monarch’s who notably advocated and increased human rights was Catherine the Great of Russia. Montesquieu and Voltaire greatly influenced her on the subject of the law code. Montesquieu's book, “The Spirit of Laws”, captivated her attention and had a great impact on her view of despotism. Catherine and Voltaire were personally acquainted and his view of an enlightened despotic state inflicted a powerful impact on Catherine’s view of how a nation should be governed.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The motto of America “to protect its citizens” was the base for creation of every document in country’s history. The Seven Articles of the United States Constitution guarantees the protection of our rights. They granted all national powers to the congress; however, it allowed each state to retain its sovereignty, freedom, and independence. The Three Branches of government protect our society from single unlimited power and leave the nation in safe position.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason the boys on the island failed to effectively govern themselves is because they lacked a system of separation of powers/checks and balances to prevent any one person from becoming too powerful. Baron de Montesquieu believed that the best government is one in which power is balanced among three separate branches of government with equal but different powers. He thought that England in the eighteenth century provided the best model of government because it divided power among three parts: the king, who enforced laws; the Parliament, which created laws; and a court system, which interpreted laws. Montesquieu’s main belief was that the best way to govern was to use a system he called “the separation of powers”. He felt that if all political power is handed over to one branch, greed and corruption inevitably result.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Rousseau, the general will is a collectively held will that aims at common good or common interest. People sharing common interest will make a better community, state and nation. He argues that by giving up individual rights and interests, people will comply with the general will. In addition, Rousseau says, that people should build a community to which they completely devote or surrender themselves “What these different interests have in common is what forms the social bond, and if there were not some point on which all interests agree, no society could exist.” (p 57).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A philosopher by the name of Montesquieu, “argued for a separation of powers, with political power divided among different classes and legal estates holding unequal rights and privileges” (McKay, 563). His idea on the separation of powers influenced the constitution of France in…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays