The believing game and doubting game are intimately associated through indirection. The doubting game is concentrated on being vigorously skeptic with assertions. By believing that all is false, concentrate all focus to put yourself in a situation to find truth from differing standpoints. The efficient path to finding error in the circumstances is to assume they are erroneous. Under these speculations, one is able to find its shortcomings. The more adamantine a claim appears, the reasons causing hesitancy will diminish; therefore resulting in acceptance of the claim. The believing game is concentrated on the presumption that all assertions are considered to be absolute truths.To accomplish this, one cannot contemplate possible falsehoods.
…show more content…
I read an assertion that stated, the existence of helium, lithium, and deuterium in the cosmos was brought into existence from the Big Bang. I was able to have faith in the claim, for the first neutrons created would have likely created elements with low atomic masses - known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis. A second assertion concerning the Big Bang I scanned over, would explain cosmic microwave background radiation. Believing that the universe came from a hot explosion would explain the radiation that exists; the radiation is remnant heat created from the hot explosion. The explosion would create high energy atoms, generating radiation. A third assertion supported the Big Bang to as why the cosmos is cold. The claim said that as the universe was expanding, the light was stretched into longer and less energetic wavelengths. When the light reaches us, it beacons low-energy microwaves; the expansion of space cools down the radiation.
Refraining from doubting the assertions, looking at them singularly instead of as a whole, I was able to believe them to be true. A multitude of evidence exists to back up the assertions, which allowed me to comprehend them and analyze them from a scientific stance. The believing game helped me insert myself into a new mindset, gather and combine information that I had learned in a new perspective. I stand behind the assertions, even with my own beliefs, for the reasoning that the certain claims are easy to justify and solidify in
I read an assertion that stated, the existence of helium, lithium, and deuterium in the cosmos was brought into existence from the Big Bang. I was able to have faith in the claim, for the first neutrons created would have likely created elements with low atomic masses - known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis. A second assertion concerning the Big Bang I scanned over, would explain cosmic microwave background radiation. Believing that the universe came from a hot explosion would explain the radiation that exists; the radiation is remnant heat created from the hot explosion. The explosion would create high energy atoms, generating radiation. A third assertion supported the Big Bang to as why the cosmos is cold. The claim said that as the universe was expanding, the light was stretched into longer and less energetic wavelengths. When the light reaches us, it beacons low-energy microwaves; the expansion of space cools down the radiation.
Refraining from doubting the assertions, looking at them singularly instead of as a whole, I was able to believe them to be true. A multitude of evidence exists to back up the assertions, which allowed me to comprehend them and analyze them from a scientific stance. The believing game helped me insert myself into a new mindset, gather and combine information that I had learned in a new perspective. I stand behind the assertions, even with my own beliefs, for the reasoning that the certain claims are easy to justify and solidify in