Buck Vs Bell Analysis

Improved Essays
Buck v. Bell upheld the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, which allowed the sterilization of women and men in America (2). Eugenic sterilization was used to target people who held undesirable traits that should be weeded out of society. Those traits were based on their mental capacity, and their race. The sterilization first began in 1907 the time where Lovercraft was alive. Thousands of people were forcefully sterilized, some not even knowing they were being sterilized. Women would go to the OBG/YN and their gynecologist would sterilize them without their consent. Men were target, as well, however females were targeted more to control the birth so defective traits can be removed. In addition, to ensure the white race continues to flourish. …show more content…
In other cases they would not deliver a woman’s child unless she agreed to be sterilized. Thee tactics were viewed as constitutional while Lovecraft was alive and it is no surprise that his ideals in his writing follows the same ideals in eugenics. During the Eugenics movement in America the Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act was passed in 1924 to prevent interracial marriage (5). In Virginia there were only considered two races white, which is a person who only had lineage of Caucasians and colored, which was everyone else. The loop hole was if you were 1/16 or less native American you can still classify as white. People who were in interracial marriages that already occurred before this law was implemented were considered as criminals. The law also classified Native Americans as colored basically removing their identity as if they no longer exist (5). By preventing interracial marriage you are preventing mixed offspring’s that could “taint” the pure white bloodline that Virginia was trying to uphold. Lovecraft refers to mix people in “The Call of Cathulu” as “hybrid spawn… mongrel… mulattos”(4), which are all very offensive terms to describe someone who is mixed. In the story Cathulu is described as a monster composed of simultaneously “of an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The moral reason of Loving v. Virginia case at the time period was under the Anti-miscegenation law of Virginia. African Americans were not allowed to cohabitate with whites regarding interracial marriages. Constitutionally, in reference to interracial marriages, the petitioner loving claimed equal protection under the law. As part of the Fourteenth Amendment the equal protection clause referred to the anti-miscegenation law of Virginia unconstitutional which discriminated Loving and his wife based upon their race. However, the anti-miscegenation law equally punished both whiter and Negroes population as a result to the equal protection clause which did not constitute invidious discrimination based upon race.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jones compares the Australian eugenics ideology to that of the Nazi sterilization laws because of their similar ideals (184). According to Jones, Australian eugenics did not develop much further because of the “horror” of Nazi sterilization laws, which were supported by fascist ideologies which were exposed following World War…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Case Of Roe Vs. Wade

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    At the point when the general public of this humankind considers fetus removal they most likely arrive at the conclusion that premature birth isn 't right. Some may concur and some may not consent to this continuous occasion that thundered nationwide amid the traverse from 1971-September 14,2004. The case that is being acquainted with you, is something extremely recognizable to you that passes by the official court title of Roe.vs. Wade. Amid the year of 1971 the incomparable court closed down to hear the case that was recorded by Ms. Norma McCorvey.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Virginia lawmakers attempted to control the behavior of the Africans in the colony very strictly. For starters, even if a slave was freed by their master they were not to be granted the same rights as a white citizen; however, they still had to pay taxes. The reasoning behind not letting freed slaves have equal rights was because the lawmakers did not want other freed slaves to join together and rebel against slavery. Furthermore, the lawmakers did not want the blacks to have the same rights as the whites because they would think they had power. If a freed slave had equal rights as whites other slaves would try anything to get free, including fighting their way to freedom.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and if you were to break this law, “your marriage would be void; . . . your children by the interracial marriage would be branded illegitimate and might also be denied their rights of inheritance” (Kennedy 1959, 58). You would also endure the legal punishment of being charged with multiple crimes or imprisonment. Congress even tried to change certain Jim Crow Laws such as equal freedom of property and location of living, “but that law was repealed in 1894” (Kennedy 1959, 72).…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Explain the Civil Rights Acts. United States courts and legislatures have a reciprocal reliance with each other. In order for a legislature to act, it requires constitutional authority. While courts require legislative/administrative support to utilize court orders and target political support.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They alleged that the Virginia anti-miscegenation statutes were unconstitutional and wanted to stop Virginia state officials from enforcing them. On January 22, 1965, the state trial judge denied the motion to vacate the sentences, and upheld the anti-miscegenation laws as constitutional, agreeing with the Lovings original convictions that they had violated the Virginia code sections: 28-50, 29-50, and 20-57. Section 28-50 said that leaving state to interracially marry with the intention of returning shall result in the punishment explained in section 29-50, which says cohabitation as man and wife in this state shall be evidence of marriage. Section 29-50 states that a violation of miscegenation laws shall be a felony and the convicted will be sentenced from 1-5 years in a penitentiary. Lastly, section 20-57 states that all marriages between "a white person and a colored person" are null and void without any judicial proceeding.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “That all servants imported and brought into this country, by sea or land, who were not Christians in their native country, Shall be accounted and be slaves, and as such be here bought and sold notwithstanding a conversion to Christianity afterwards” (Virginia Slave Code). This pretty much stated that any black person who was servant was a slave. Even if a person was close to being freed this new code rewrote all slaves rights in this English code. This also included children of slaves and how they would be treated. Servant’s children were part of what the French included in the Code Noir.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subconscious fears of miscegenation with the negroes and white Americans led to legal restrictions on free Negroes and also Slave Codes sanctions. In 1662, Virginia regulated any intercourse with a negro man or woman and also doubling the fine for the act. Also, Maryland went on to regulate interracial marriages in 1664 and calling the Negroes a "disgrace of our Nation" and "shameful Matches." The insufficient amount of rights that the free Negroes had were taken away in a progressively…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth Mcdonald gave women a sense of choice and empowering more freedom that they never had before. She grew up in Athens, a small town in Clarke County, Georgia. Elizabeth was haunted by her mother's premature death giving birth to her, determined to escape similar fate Elizabeth decided not to have children and wanted to forever prevent the same scenario from happening to anyone else. Elizabeth attended Agnes Scott Institute in 1908, four years later when she was 21 she moved to New York City, settling in the Manhattan neighborhood of Greenwich Village and went on to study nursing at White Plains Hospital. She worked closely with Margaret Sanger as a side by side nurse, after realizing they came from similar upbringings and have a similar mentality on having children, Margaret sold her ideals on Birth Control…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the early 20th century, Margaret Sanger began a major reform, known as the birth control movement, in order to make contraception widely available so that women could limit the size of their families. I n “I Resolved that Women should have knowledge of Contraception,” Margaret Sanger describes women’s desperate efforts to limit their family size by attempting to prevent or eliminate pregnancy and their reasons behind doing so. Included was the story of her mother’s death, which was a major contributing factor in her desire for the birth control movement. Sanger tailored her lectures towards working class women, middle-class women, and those in the medical profession who she desired to join the cause. Women in the twentieth century were…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abuses, written by Kathryn Krase, she describes the history and origin of where sterilization came to be. The purpose of choosing this article is to establish a background of how this procedure became a way of controlling the population. In the year 1907, the United States established a policy that allowed the government the right to “sterilize unwilling and unwitting people” (Krase, 2014). The United States would pass laws that ensured that anyone that is not capable of bearing a child, such as, the mentally ill, the poor, the unwed, the dependent, or the diseased would be sterilized because they are not suitable to be a parent, according to the state (Krase, 2014). In the 20th century there were Eugenics Boards opening up in the states that accepted these laws and they were there to make sure that unsuitable parents cannot have children.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following two historical events are cases of countries wanting to control their population growth and in order to do that they decided to sterilize millions of people. The first example I will talk about is India in 1975. According to a BBC News article, India was in a state of emergency at that time and they sterilized 8 million people. Now I don’t care what kind of emergency they were dealing with, even if it was the end of the World, there is no reason to take away people’s right to reproduce. The second example I chose to discuss is China and its one child policy.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the premeditated end of a person pregnancy, which is done during the primary term of pregnancy. The first distinguished portrayal of fetus removal derives from ancient Egyptian medical records which date as far back as three thousand years BCE. The earliest legal outlaw on fetus removal dates from the eleventh century BCE Code of Assura, it constrains capital punishment toward married females who commit abortions without the consent of their spouses. Amid the 1800s, abortion was legitimate work in the United States, however, most states made it illegal depending it were to save the life of the woman.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion Should Be Legal

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “In 1965, illegal abortions made up one-sixth of all pregnancy – and childbirth – related deaths” (“Abortion Access”). This justifies that if abortion isn’t legal, then those who want to get rid of the fetus will perform illegal abortions such as self-abortion. As a result, those who perform self-abortion will end up harming themselves. Although many are against abortion because they consider it evil/inhumane, it should be legal because the mother could have been raped, have a disabled fetus, or have an unwanted pregnancy.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays