• Home Page
  • Case Study: Human Dignity And Capital Punishment

Case Study: Human Dignity And Capital Punishment

Improved Essays
Show More
Veronica Waters S00169400
Tutor Name: Jen Koch

Veronica Waters S00169400
Tutor Name: Jen Koch

Uncc300 assessment task 2: case study
Case Study 2: Human Dignity and Capital Punishment

This essay will discuss human dignity and capital punishment. Human dignity is a critical factor because this is someone?s life that could be ended because of people?s different views on dignity and it challenges the significance of human dignity from different perspectives. This issue of human dignity and the capital punishment will be explored through two different perspectives. The first perspective to be examined is perspective two; that people that are found guilty of a major crime should be given the chance to rehabilitate themselves and restore their …show more content…
This perspective will be explored through the relation of this perspective to human dignity and the justification of the perspective. The reading that supports this perspective is that of Conquergood (2002). Conquergood (2002) looks at the way in which humans are faced with capital punishment and how it has always been a public affair to show society that if you commit criminal acts then you will be subject to capital punishment. The quadrant that is most evident in this reading is 2B. Quadrant 2B is defined as ?dignity that humans can acquire or lose through moral or immoral behaviour: humans acquire dignity when they behave well in society, but can also lose it when they behave badly? (ACU, 2016, section. 2.1.3). Capital punishment is considered justified because it gives closure to the victims? families and to society that if someone does something bad then they will have to face the consequences. This reading fits into quadrant 2B because most of the arguments made are that capital punishment is right because it gives closure and argues that if you do something wrong society needs to see that the person will face capital punishment because they have committed this …show more content…
This was examined by exploring perspective two that enables offenders to be able to rehabilitate themselves and hold the values of quadrant 2A. and perspective three was also explored which considers capital punishment to be justified as the offenders have lost their dignity in relation with quadrant 2B. And finally, the many dimensions of humans was explored and the importance of viewing human dignity as multidimensional. Capital punishment is a complex issue that needs to be considered from a multidimensional

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Scott Turow's Essay
    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Scott Turow's Essay

    Nadine El Tanahy Dr. Dina S Lamey Rhet 1010 Oct. 15th Outline I. Introduction to analysis. II. Audience.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hero's Journey Chapter 2 Analysis
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hero's Journey Chapter 2 Analysis

    faith, so why are they so mean and unfriendly I thought to myself? The way that they presented themselves every morning influence my thinking about nuns in a negative way. I never disrespect them in any way. In reading a certain paragraph in chapter 2, I must say I have a different perspective about nuns, I realize that I was quick to make an assumption based on a person religions rather than seeing that person for whom they are. It is important to consider here that even the person who is completely committed to a certain worldview, at times, may fall short of living in a way that exemplifies the values to which he or she truly holds.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Edward I. Koch's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Edward I. Koch's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Are The Ethical Issues In Dead Man Walking
    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Are The Ethical Issues In Dead Man Walking

    We all know that everyone has natural rights; but do we have the right to take those rights from those who have taken them from others? The treatment of Matthew Poncelet in the film Dead Man Walking shows how the Catholic Social Themes Call to Community, Family, and Participation, Life and Dignity of the Human Person, and Rights and Responsibilities have the potential to be ignored in death penalty cases. The Catholic Social Teaching theme Life and Dignity of the Human Person has the potential to be ignored in death penalty cases, which is shown in the film Dead Man Waking. One of the main principles of the theme Life and Dignity of the Human Person is that everyone has a right to life.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dick Hickock's Arguments Against Capital Punishment
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dick Hickock's Arguments Against Capital Punishment

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nathanson's Argument Against The Death Penalty
    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nathanson's Argument Against The Death Penalty

    Nathanson’s main point is that the capital punishment is a form of cruel and unusual punishment, denying individuals of their human desert (natural rights that don’t need to be earned and cannot be taken away) and setting a bad example for the rest of society. No matter anyone’s actions, they retain a certain level of dignity and should the state infringe upon this, the state thus promotes violence and its continuation (in the form of retaliation). While respecting the law is important, we must always be critical of it as injustice can always become present. A counterargument to Nathanson’s ideas would discuss cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of An Eye For An Eye By Stephen Nathanson
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of An Eye For An Eye By Stephen Nathanson

    Stephen Nathanson, who wrote “An eye for an eye?” suggests the factual and moral beliefs about the death penalty are wrong and need to be strictly abolished. The passage states, “ A person’s actions, it seems, provide not only a basis for a moral appraisal of the person but also a guide to how he should be treated”. Also stated, “ What people deserve as recipients of rewards or punishments is determined by what they do as agents”. The argument claiming people should get a punishment based on what they do is accurate. What is not accurate however, is suggesting if someone murders another person, they should receive capital punishment.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death Penalty Texas

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment Annotated Bibliography Essay
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment Annotated Bibliography Essay

    Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment In The Media
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Capital Punishment In The Media

    Introduction Capital punishment has been a topic of much debate for many years with very differing points of view. Much of the research done about capital punishment is based on the public opinions, making it an issue close to peoples morals and idealistic thought. The news media then caters to the leaning of the public’s morals. In dealing with capital punishment, the news media tends to focus on three different popular mentalities; the ‘eye for an eye’ mentality, punishment should fit the crime mentality, and the declaring it inhumane treatment of individuals mentality. By focusing on these three views, the media has been able to help inform the public according to the prevailing view of the individual case.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Killing People Is Wrong
    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Death Penalty: Killing People Is Wrong

    ‘Killing people is wrong’, a statement everyone can stand behind, however, in some arguments, would depend on who did the killing (Koch 483). The death penalty has been under the watchful eye of the United States population for some time now, and has developed an audience on both sides of the argument. Many believe the death penalty is morally wrong, alluding to scriptures from the Bible. Others would argue the death penalty is a way of justice for the murderers and ultimately for the victims. The light shed from opposing views could help reach a resolve and put the issue at rest, however, in the meantime, one must pull from both sides to decide for themselves.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment

    In this paper, I will discuss Nathansons argument against capital punishment. I will discuss how Nathanson has responses to Haags arguments with two cases. I argue that Haag has good responses but I would agree with Nathanson to say that one must treat everyone the same depending on their crimes without treating each criminal differently even though they have committed the same crime but are not getting the same punishment. Haag’s primary objection in capital punishment was that it does not matter if the death penalty is administered arbitrarily because individual punishments depend on individual quilt alone, and whether punishments are distributed equally among the class of guilty persons does not matter.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment In Stephen Nathanson's An Eye For An Eye?
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment In Stephen Nathanson's An Eye For An Eye?

    Stephen Nathanson’s argument in “An Eye for an Eye?” stresses the need to do away with the ultimate form of punishment; the death penalty. Nathanson compares the ancient principle of equal retaliation to the current idea of capital punishment. He provides moral arguments for preserving the sanctity of human life as he points out the flaws with murdering killers. The views of other scholars of philosophy are cited by Nathanson and then analyzed for their invalid points. Nathanson first describes the problems with the lex talionis principle, or the idea of “an eye for an eye”.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ernest Van Den Haag Capital Punishment Analysis

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Jeffrey Reiman Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jeffrey Reiman Capital Punishment Analysis

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings