The Damned Human Race Comparison Essay

Superior Essays
In many societies, there are groups of people who do not wish to conform or are actively against the views of the time. Mark Twain’s The Damned Human Race and Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience are examples of writings which focus on what they each see wrong with society. They each express their own beliefs which makes each one different. By comparing the opinions of the two authors, we see similarities and differences. They share some similarities with one another, such as a lack of faith in certain groups of people as well as a hatred for war. Some major differences in the two are what they consider to the reason for evil in the world and what we must do to solve those problems.
Both authors show a lack of faith in the people of the world, but especially certain groups. In Twain’s example, the majority of his problems come from humans themselves; however, special emphasis is given to certain groups of people such as businessmen, hunters, and religious people. He says “Man is the Religious Animal. He is the only Religious Animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion, several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself, and cuts his throat if his theology isn’t straight.” (604) Throughout history, humans have fought with one another and many of the conflicts are based on
…show more content…
While Twain believes that it is a poison to be removed, Thoreau trusts in humanity and that it will ultimately help us become better. Both fight against similar problems, such as war and the evil in the world; understanding that there are many problems which are applicable in every age. With their writings we understand some of the problems that must be corrected, but with such different opinions, it is difficult to judge which option would work. While they have differing opinions on the root cause and the solution to the issues they find, they express their opinions for the problems of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The difference of Machiavelli and Thoreau’s view on governing comes from the fact that they both are taking opposite perspectives on the same issue. Both discuss harsh governing. Machiavelli views it as necessary, while Thoreau views it as unjust, however Machiavelli is writing as one who governs, while Thoreau is writing as one being governed. The difference in audience is the cause for the differences between Machiavelli and Thoreau’s understanding of morality, humanity, and efficiency.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Twain, in his juvenalian essay “The War Prayer” (1923) lambasts war and the motivations behind fighting them. He supports his argument by incorporating potent sarcastic diction, utilizing hyperbole, and by the use of hypocrisy. Twain’s purpose is to convey the absurdity of war and to examine what he believes to be the asinine motivations behind going to war, especially those of a religious and patriotic nature, in the hope that future conflict is avoided. He adopts an ironic tone (“An aged stranger entered [the church] and moved with slow and noiseless step[s] up the main aisle... then in a deep voice he said ‘[I am] bearing a message from Almighty God’... the words smote the house with a shock... beseeching His aid in our good cause/…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “This is a beautiful example of the reality that conscious, awake and aware humans have always been here.” (Gardner) Mark Twain has placed everything very straight forward and clear way about what humans do to other humans. I think the major idea in this piece was telling people how these so-called lower animals can leave together when they are totally different species, but humans being the same species can not leave together or to help each other out just for the sake of doing it. Mark Twain uses a lot of rhetorical situations to compare humans to lower animals.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there have been individuals and forms of government lacking a moral conscience, and this will most likely continue to occur. Many argue that this is merely a facet of human nature - we, as human beings, are inherently greedy and corrupt. However, there are those who contrast sharply with this view, crying out against the wrongdoings of certain powers, pushing for change and reform. Henry David Thoreau is a prime example of these individuals. Using personification, forthright and cynical diction, and rhetorical questions, Thoreau criticizes the American government, and certain aspects of society in “Civil Disobedience” and the inability of individuals to reach their true potential in “Walden”.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reveal differences and similarities on their outlook on government and solutions to rid their prospective states of certain problems. These solutions focus on freeing oneself from conforming to societal norms in favor of seeking “enlightenment” and awareness. The aforementioned great minds of their times both argue variations of the same views on human existence and an individual 's role in their respective societies. At their core, these two political philosophies urge humanity to threaten the safety of the status quo; they push man to dare to be skeptics, dare to climb out of the depths of their limited perspectives, dare to question what is true reality…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Letters from the Earth The entirety our our semester has focused on one major theme: the disappearance or hiddenness of God. Various texts, including the Disappearance of God, centralize this argument based off of observations and evidence alone. Diving solely into Letters from the Earth, Mark Twain illustrates God’s hiddenness with a satirical piece separating God’s perspective from human’s and even Satan’s viewpoint of God’s involvement. The widened gap of views, from God, humans, and Satan, show discrepancy in the religious world that Mark Twain presents.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As time progresses, it is only reasonable that political thinking evolves and morals change yet overarching concepts remain constant. Though nearly a century apart, authors John Steinbeck and Henry David Thoreau discuss the long disputed issue of the role of a government in their respective works, Grapes of Wrath and “Civil Disobedience.” While Thoreau published his critical essay during the impending Mexican American War, Steinbeck focused on the Great Depression era and subsequent crises. However different the circumstances, both writers convey similar underlying thematic notions about the influence of the federal government and the rights of the people. In some respects, their perspectives clash and in others they coincide.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay “Civil Disobedience” argues that American citizens should not be loath to disobey their corrupt and useless government, using metaphor as a rhetorical device to prove his point and provide a call to action for readers. In the essay, Thoreau describes the government as a corrupt, immoral, and often useless agent, and strongly criticizes the American population for following it so blindly. He encourages readers to act in protest of their unjust government, urging them to act with their consciences and not based on what the law dictates; he also insists that they engage in civil disobedience, and refuse to pay certain taxes. By using metaphor in the essay, Thoreau makes the piece more readable and relatable,…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone retains a specific “human” nature; however, it is left up to the individual how they choose to interpret various aspects of human nature in their everyday personalities. In the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain incorporates various characters to capitalize on the flawed aspects of human nature. In the novel, it is evident that Twain is showing his disapproval towards the way humans behave. Each character: Pap, Grangerfords and Shepherdsons, and the King and Duke are able to embody one side of the human race. How is it that one man is able to cause so much damage in someone’s life?…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays