Connotation Model

Decent Essays
Ultimately, the Commonwealth's power to enact legislation for same-sex marriages depends on whether the constitutional meaning of 'marriage' in s 51 (xxi) includes same-sex unions. The connotation/denotation distinction is argued to accommodate adaptability and flexibility within the Constitution as it recognises the core meaning of a term as well as its application on evolving circumstances. However, there are also arguments against this model, asserting that it is contradicting and does not hold sufficient significance for the matter of marriage due to its lack of practical utility in respect to the contemporary understanding of marriage.

Nevertheless, in applying this model, two outcomes may arise. If the constitutional meaning of 'marriage'

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Are you a Democrat or a Republican? If you are a Democrat, you can learn about your blue family in this book and if you are a Republican, you can learn about your red family in this book. The purpose of this book is for you to understand the different opinions on each side of the group. This book has split America into two big parts red, more conservative and traditional side, and blue, the more modern side (Cahn and Carbone, 2010: 1). Cahn and Carbone’s book Red Families v. Blue Families: Legal Polarization and the Creation of Culture is about conservatives and modernists opinions on issues like same-sex marriages, abortion, divorces, women, and teen pregnancy.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legalisation of same-sex marriage in Australia occurred on the 9th of December 2017. The national vote for ‘yes’ of 61.6 percent, influenced the proposal displaying the majority of Australia’s intention of an accepting and equal society however, 38.4% of the…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage is a civil union that should be a right that all are allowed to. Not just for the individuals, but to promote healthy and happy family relationships. The case does more than allow individuals to marry, it redefines marriage as it has always been know. Some would call marriage an intimate union between a man and a woman to provide a stable family, the government can easily redefine this. The Constitution does not define marriage, the people define marriage.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Family Institution: Then and Now The purpose and understanding of the family institution has changed drastically since the Founders. The Founders associated marriage, specifically a stable one, with the sustainability of the family. Today marriage is less common, it happens later in life, and more of them end in divorce. Living together outside of wedlock was once prohibited, but now it is almost expected.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Spiegel takes an opposing viewpoint in this article to one of the biggest reasons presented to support homosexual marriage – that withholding the right is unjust. He instead argues that it would keep within the bounds of justice to ban homosexual marriage. He describes heterosexual union as having a special value to society due to it an indispensable means for human birth. He continues on that thought that what has a special societal value deserves to have special recognition and sanction. When civil ordinances recognize homosexual unions as being on the same level as heterosexual unions, this causes the special value to society inherent in straight marriage to be rejected, and it is not right to deny those in straight relationships…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditional marriage and family, based on one man and one woman, is the foundation for a free society and has for millennia been entrusted with rearing children and instilling cultural values. We condemn the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor, which wrongly removed the ability of Congress to define marriage policy in federal law. We also condemn the Supreme Court’s lawless ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which in the words of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, was a “judicial Putsch” full of “silly extravagances” that reduced “the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall (Lopez). Reply 1: Every human being has a right to choose whom they love, build a life with and, be themselves with. There is nothing wrong with people believing in traditional values.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overview Same-sex marriage is a highly controversial topic of discussion spreading from communities to parliaments and governments, and has become increasingly recognised all around the world over the past few years. Since 2001, many countries have passed bills to legalise same sex unions and provide them with equal rights, and then years later have fully legalised gay marriage, the first being The Netherlands (2001), however Australia is not one of those countries. Gay marriage and obtaining equal rights for same-sex couples has been drifting around the Australian parliament for years, with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd (2007-2010, 2013) promising action within 100 days of the election date if re-elected in 2013, however the Liberal Party won the election and Tony Abbott became Prime Minister. Despite Tony Abbott’s sister Christine Forster being in a engaged to her partner Miss Virginia Edwards, strongly opinionated and exceptionally religious Mr Abbott still opposes same-sex marriage and has no intention of legalising anything same-sex related.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dailey claims that if marriage is redefined, it will be “impossible to exclude virtually any relationship between two or more partners of either sex—even non-human ‘partners’”. He egregiously claims “redefining marriage logically leads to the Missouri man and his mare”. In the absence of supporting evidence, Dailey’s claim cannot be considered…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federal Family Law

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Australian society being in a same-sex relationship is still perceived by many as a deviant act and a danger to social function and the heterosexual norm. Critics often argue that for children to receive the best care they need two parents of the opposite sex, and same-sex couples of either sex will never be able to wholly produce a supportive and productive family setting. Although these arguments are usually based on religious or ideological beliefs about what establishes a family. However, despite this disapproval, from the late 1960s gay and lesbian rights movements have been organised in Australia, fighting for the rights of same-sex couples. Particularly in the last 10 years these movements have had a lot of success, particularly in the amount of legal support they have gained towards same-sex couple and parenting relationships.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Family Definition Essay

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (Kendall 434) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (Kendall 434) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the States. (Kendall 434)…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Marriage” can refer to a legal contract and civil status, a religious rite, and a social practice, all of which vary by legal jurisdiction, religious doctrine, and culture. History shows considerable variation in marital practices: polygyny has…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States has long experienced a struggle between people supporting each side of the argument since it is impossible to provide a compromise between them (Lipp). Importantly, the proponents of gay marriages indicate that the world, through its judicial systems, is attempting to limit their rights to wed. Contrastingly, the opponents of the act state that it is against natural law that advocates for heterosexual relationships. Consequently, it is…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, right? Well, then what happens when you suddenly change the definition and turn it into a “loving, romantic union between committed adults?” (Vogt). It doesn’t work like that. It confuses society and children.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays