Comparing Crito's Argument And Reason With Socrates

Improved Essays
Crito attempts to argue and reason with Socrates. Crito argues that he would lose an irreplaceable friend, reflect badly on Socrates’ friends and refusing his friends’ help, aiding his enemies, abandoning his children, and taking the easy way out. Socrates questioned Crito if one should care about the opinion of the many, or to only listen to the good and wise men. Socrates believed that one should listen only to the wise men, which is the basis to his response to Crito’s arguments that refusing to escape from prison with his friends’ help would reflect badly on them. He also believes that he should obey the Law of Athens as it is just.
Socrates is a man who is concerned with truth and justice. In fact, he believes that a man should live
…show more content…
Try to do what is good and right and honorable as agreed upon by all people. If it is within your power, make peace with all people. Again, my loved ones, do not seek revenge; instead, allow God’s wrath to make sure justice is served. Turn it over to Him. For the Scriptures say, “Revenge is Mine. I will settle all scores.” (New International Version). Despite his religious background, Socrates portrays this verses. Socrates decides not to escape from prison, which is an evil act, when he knew that the leaders of Athens’ sentence was evil. Romans noted that we are to do what is good, right, and honorable. In Socrates’ situation, he is doing what is right and honorable by living in the consistent truth, which leads to a good life. Socrates is attempting to make peace by not smuggling himself out of prison, although his friends has offered their resources. During his imprisonment, Socrates was thinking about justice, and hoping that justice will be carried out. As a result, Socrates is known as a martyr for philosophy and he is talked about even in the twenty-first century; people still learn and respect his works and ideas in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Crito Argument

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Crito” is a dialogue written by Plato during 360 B.C.E. In the beginning of the dialogue, Socrates is in prison waiting to be executed. He is visited by his friend, Crito, which tries to convince Socrates to escape the prison. Crito and his friends had made arrangements so that Socrates can escape, but Socrates is unwilling to do so as he wants to go through his execution. Crito presents to him many arguments to try to persuade him to escape.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He feels so strong about the laws of Athens that he will even pay with his life. Socrates is a true patriot that put the needs of Athens laws before his need to…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the fateful trial where Socrates in unjustly condemned to death, his friend Crito appears with the desire to help him escape, upon awakening Socrates makes several arguments where he tries to persuade his friend Crito not to escape his cell, Socrates and Crito argues that the escape Would be unjust because he wouldn’t oppose the laws of Athens that protected his parents and raised him from a child, although he considered the decision that sentenced him to death unjust, he considers that the escape would not benefit his friends or his children, He would leave them orphans and themselves committed to the laws and justice of Athens, which would be unfair to them. With these arguments, Socrates shows Crito the responsibility that would lead…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Socrates and Crito are arguing in the Crito, Crito shows concern for the “public opinion”. Socrates goes on to argue…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Crito is afraid of the people’s opinion pertaining to his not letting Socrates free when he had the chance. His main concern is that they will say that he was paid off to let Socrates stay and be killed. Socrates declares that the opinions of those who simply do not understand do not matter when it comes to making a critical decision such as the one at hand. Then, without worrying about the Athenian’s sentiments, he compares the good that might come out of the situation and the bad: between making an escape and staying to die. Socrates goes on to say that if he disobeys the laws under which he has been placed and abided by for his whole life, he will be forced into a meaningless existence, being an enemy.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crito by Plato is premised with Socrates in his prison cell and awaiting his execution. Socrates’ friend Crito then comes and tries to convince him to escape his cell. Socrates and Crito discuss and argue about whether Socrates should escape prison or not. In their dialogue, the topic about laws emerge. Socrates states, “by giving every Athenian the opportunity, once arrived at voting age and having observed the affairs of the city and us the laws...…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Will you associate with them, Socrates, and feel no shame when talking with them?” (Crito 53d) He expresses his inner feelings of thinking about fleeing but discarding the option because it will change the way people see him and how they interact with him. Socrates concepts of lawful and unlawful in the Crito seem to have come down to a second stage and the worry of the judgement is more noticeable as we read. The time in jail has given Socrates the chance of overthinking the possibilities and clearly, he has forgotten his words in trial.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates: A Man of Contradiction Even the wisest of men tend to make bad decisions when they are backed into a corner, with no place to turn. In the case of Socrates, however, his beliefs ran true until he was put to death. When given the opportunity to escape his fate, Socrates chose to remain in jail and receive the punishment handed down by the courts. Although Socrates truly believed in his own innocence, to remain in jail was the only action he could take, in order to be just to himself, the courts, and the gods.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Crito goes on to explain that those who accused and sentence him is an act of injustice and by Socrates not escaping, Crito believes that he is acting unjustly by following what his accusers did to him. Crito believes, “it is not just for [Socrates] to do what [he is] doing, throwing away your life when [he] might save it” (Plato 82). Again, Crito believes that Socrates not escaping is going to harm his own self as well as his friends (including Crito) as well as Socrates’s children. Crito states also that “most people will never believe that it was [him] who refused to leave this place when [they] tried [their] hardest to persuade [him]” (Plato 81).…

    • 1271 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito's Argument Analysis

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Crito’s second argument was weaker than his first. It didn’t seem to carry any importance to Socrates, which therefore, makes this argument senseless. This argument caused Socrates to raise a greater question of morality, and whether it was moral of them to act upon such illegal issues. In his last, but not least argument, Crito then moves along to presenting the alleged harms Socrates would cause for his children.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice versus injustice is one of the biggest conflicts in this world as justice lacks one true definition. Socrates goes out to find the meaning of justice, but what he finds is a conflict where the unjust man is not always the loser. The unjust man can be better than the just man and the argument that the fair man is superior does not always hold up against injustice. Justice benefits the mass while injustice aids the individual. Controlling people is easier with justice.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Oxford Dictionary, justice is being defined as a just behavior or a treatment. In the ancient Greek, justice has been perceived differently. Different philosophers have different arguments towards that topic of “ What is Justice?”. Plato elaborates on this topic in his book Republic to give his opinion about what justice is through different characters such as, Thrasymachus and Socrates. Thrasymachus is a sophist, who challenged the view of justice and moral values and gives a glimpse of the kind of the point of view from someone who lives in the 5th century Athenians.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Socrates was not convinced and he presented Plato with the question “Ought a man to do what he admits to be right, or ought he to betray the right?” Plato replied “He ought to do what he thinks right.” Socrates explained to Plato how important it was for him not to do any wrong even though wrong has been done to him. This also shows how Socrates was a humble man that stood by his morals even if it meant death.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the end of Book IV of the Republic, Socrates offers a response to Glaucon 's question, “What is justice?” Socrates states his answer through various forms of metaphors and images. To the naked eye, his response is rather contradictory and baffling. Yet, through thorough reading, discussion, and bearing a perplexed eagerness to explore such classic ambiguity, one can only then begin to understand Socrates claim as to what consists of justice. Socrates himself identifies that his outlook is, indeed, much or unconventional therefore he adds his own parables and metaphors to ease this quaint contradictory declarations.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays