In the article, New Orleans Is Wrong to Remove Its Confederate Monuments, Daniel Davidson argues that it was wrong for the confederate statues in New Orleans to be taken down. He advocates his argument by using a numerous amount of rhetorical strategies- slippery slope, parallel structure, rhetorical questions, ethos, pathos, and logos. In Davidson’s article, he starts off with using a story of the first confederate stature being torn down- in the story, Davidson uses pathos to connect with the intended audience and get them to believe and agree with his viewpoint. After telling pathos-filled stories, he includes the use of a slippery slope- he explains that the removal of one confederate statue will continue and cause school and public memorials
