Juries are predominately involved with criminal cases that involve indictable offences. Juries usually consist of 12 jurors, these 12 people are handed the authority to make decisions that will ultimately affect the results of the case. In a criminal trial process the judge instructs the jury on the points on the case that they must decide upon and prove true or false. The role of the jury then, is to decide the facts on the case. They decide what evidence proves itself beyond reasonable doubt and what evidence proves what the judge says. After the Jury make a decision they then come back to the court room with their verdict. When there is a trial occurring that involves a jury there are multiple advantages and disadvantages to the process.
Advantages of a jury system
A major advantage to using a jury system within the criminal trial process is the involvement of the community. As the jury is usually made up of the everyday citizen it …show more content…
An example of this was when two of the jurors were on the trial of a gang rape, the two men went and illegally observed and investigated the site. This is a HUGE disadvantage! The case mentioned was forced to be closed and restarted, in turn costing tax payers more money, just because the jurors then brought personal context into play.
The unprofessional aspect of the jurors can also make them venerable to scaring as they are made to sit through and discover evidence that can often be disturbing and confronting. Jurors can also be very unfair due to not being professionally trained in the courts, as if a juror is only attending because they are forced to through jury duty then they can possibly not care about the trial at all. They can not pay attention and give an unfair opinion as they do not care about the
Advantages of a jury system
A major advantage to using a jury system within the criminal trial process is the involvement of the community. As the jury is usually made up of the everyday citizen it …show more content…
An example of this was when two of the jurors were on the trial of a gang rape, the two men went and illegally observed and investigated the site. This is a HUGE disadvantage! The case mentioned was forced to be closed and restarted, in turn costing tax payers more money, just because the jurors then brought personal context into play.
The unprofessional aspect of the jurors can also make them venerable to scaring as they are made to sit through and discover evidence that can often be disturbing and confronting. Jurors can also be very unfair due to not being professionally trained in the courts, as if a juror is only attending because they are forced to through jury duty then they can possibly not care about the trial at all. They can not pay attention and give an unfair opinion as they do not care about the