Does The Ship Hold The False Belief Clifford

Improved Essays
Summary
In this essay, Clifford provides two stories about belief. The first story is about a ship-owner with an old ship. The ship-owner knows that his ship might need to be overhauled but talks himself out of his doubts by reminding himself that the ship has sailed safely many times before. The ship then sinks and all the passengers die. Clifford points out that the ship-owner is morally responsible for the deaths of these people because he let his beliefs guide his action without evidence. Furthermore, Clifford also believes that the ship-owner would be equally guilty if the ship had not sunk because it was wrong of him to hold the false belief.

The second story is about an island where certain members are agitating the public into joining

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, the ship was sent back by the government. He also mentions the tragic situations which…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Letter To Corn's Unbeliefs

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most Christians have at times experienced a “crisis of faith” due to new contrasting ideals that may provoke questions (Carroll, 409). Entering college for the first time is a vulnerable time for anyone who has been brought up all their life to think and believe as they are told. College freshman, Alfred Corn, was experiencing this unfortunate crisis. (Carroll, 409) The knowledge we individually obtain throughout our livelihood constantly evolves and adapts to new information and experiences, unfortunately learning too much at times makes us question our current standing beliefs.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The act of actively combating our inductive bias in Kathryn Schulz’s Evidence in Kathryn Schulz’s essay, “Evidence”, the argument of the essay follows various situations brought up by Schulz, showing that people should take a positive approach to being wrong, and accept our error-prone nature, rather than obsessing with a perfect inadvertently-free ideal. Schulz ties together a lot of strong evidence, but fades back from a clear conclusion, steering the readers toward a relationship between error and the self. She further studies moral transformation on conversations, our attachment to a view wrongly identified due to our pre-conceived opinion off prior experience. Schulz stresses that in order for us to improve our relationship with to evidence,…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will be discussing the popular deceiver argument, and Jonathan Vogel’s response to it. In his article, Vogel describes the deceiver argument and talks the reader through what it is and what it is trying to explain. After he does this, Vogel then goes on to reject the deceiver argument, claiming that premise two of the argument is false. The responses that have been put forth are then discussed by Vogel, most likely trying to come up with a response he deems worthy of being the best response to the deceiver argument. After Vogel finds his response of choice, he goes on to briefly explain it.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harpers Island Analysis

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Harpers Island was once a scene of a gruesome series of murders. Now seven years later, family and friend gather on the island for a wedding, but one by one… they begin to die. Harpers Island is about a group of family and friends who travel to a secluded island for a distortion wedding. They’ve come to laugh, to love, and though they don’t know it... To die.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Dangers of being Certain Though doubt has always held a negative connotation in my mind, a dark shadow that looms over certainty, truth, and progress, John Patrick Shanley, through his film, not only claims but makes us feel quite the opposite: that doubt is in fact a valuable asset in gaining an objective view when determining “good” from “bad” and discovering the truth. Stanley utilises the two main characters in his film to depict the dangers of acting upon certainty without doubt. I will be exploring two research questions within my reflection: “How does relative societal rules define what is good and bad?” and “To what degree does self interest drive us to be bad?” through the comparison of the the two main characters Sister Aloysius…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Defense, Critique and Integration of the 4 Apologetic Methods Defense of Fideism To approach apologetics is to seek to fulfill the command of Scripture “always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you” In light of this, the believer ought to approach apologetics as the overflow of their relationship with Jesus. Approaching apologetics from the fideist perspective is to embrace the mystery and paradox of knowing God in faith, rather than through an extended philosophically rooted line of reasoning. Instead of using human means to explain the reality which is far above human understanding, fideist seek to share their encounter with Jesus, the ultimate reality, rather than attempting to…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Evidentialism point of view appeals more to my sense of beliefs because I find it necessary to have substantial evidence in order to believe something. Furthermore I agree to the point that ones private belief can indeed harm someone in situations like the ship owners people own beliefs lead to the harm of others. Reformed Epistemology has an unwavering confidence in their beliefs that even when provided evidence that they are wrong they still chose to believe. Plantiga pointed out evidentialism inconsistency but that is due the restructuring of their beliefs based upon the new evidence gained. Evidentialism beliefs are malleable and flexible and change based upon the evidence given it disproves or reassure what they already know.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karen Moore's Paradox

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I would like to assert that the problem of Moore’s Paradox—the instinctual contradiction—is perhaps not exactly what we think it is: a discrepancy or inconsistency of belief or claim, but instead, perhaps, it is merely a verbalization of a result that is intrinsic to beings that can think of (about) themselves and for themselves; and that the perceived contradiction stems from a normative claim being made about belief that, in fact, should not be made. Moore’s problem, to briefly summarize, is that there is a contradiction in the phrase(s): p is true, but I do not believe p and p is true, but I believe not p. The contradiction seems to be in that asserting the truth of p, one must also believe p. It seems absurd to think that we can believe…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In ‘The Subjectivity of Values’, J L Mackie examines error theory and objective morality vs non-cognitivism. Mackie’s report represents moral scepticism using moral error theory. By taking an error theory approach, Mackie confronts morality similarly to the manner in which an atheist confronts religion. Moral error theory could be broken down to a version of the Justified True Belief outline as follows: Moral claims are universally false There is reason to believe that moral claims are universally false There is no justification for believing any deniable claim…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Works Cited Hill, Christopher. “Robinson Crusoe.” History Workshop, no. 10, 1980, pp. 6–24. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4288310.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emersons' third maxim says, "Nothing is at least sacred, but then integrity of your own mind." In other words, the strength of our thoughts and our beliefs is what is most important to each and every individual. The theme that is projected within this statement is that a person's thoughts, opinions, and beliefs have more value than what they may possess materialistically. This theme is not only said in Emerson's maxims, but also in the play called The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail that contains many characters that project the message and lesson of this theme.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robinson Crusoe can be considered a spiritual autobiography, a story of a man’s spiritual pilgrimage, from reprobate through regret and faith to devout man of God. Indeed, it is possible to trace Robinson’s progress from a state of sin to a state of grace, “a rebellion-punishment-repentance-deliverance sequence described from the earliest moment of Christendom as characteristic of fallen men who are accorded God’s grace” (Hunter 252). The spiritual autobiography usually includes some elements that are typical of the Puritan drama, known “as the drama of the soul”, which many scholars consider “educational, inspiring, and productive of greater piety and higher morality” (Hunter 251-252). Consequently, Crusoe serves the purpose of demonstrating…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays