For example, when the author says” Both parties seemed to be the same, the same neocon bombings of other countries.” Neocon (a democrat conservative views) being used and never defined throughout the entire article. Also, the terms cahoots (partnered with) and WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) go completely unexplained as well. In addition, the article insults the reader by saying” No one in their right mind could possibly support for Trump and those that did were themselves nothing but uneducated racists.” Thereby stating that anyone that doesn’t support Donald Trump automatically assumes people who do are uneducated and racist. Which is false while many Americans do not support Trump they have never went as far as to call Trump supporters uneducated and racist. That statement is generalizing anyone who doesn’t support trump as bad people to get
For example, when the author says” Both parties seemed to be the same, the same neocon bombings of other countries.” Neocon (a democrat conservative views) being used and never defined throughout the entire article. Also, the terms cahoots (partnered with) and WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) go completely unexplained as well. In addition, the article insults the reader by saying” No one in their right mind could possibly support for Trump and those that did were themselves nothing but uneducated racists.” Thereby stating that anyone that doesn’t support Donald Trump automatically assumes people who do are uneducated and racist. Which is false while many Americans do not support Trump they have never went as far as to call Trump supporters uneducated and racist. That statement is generalizing anyone who doesn’t support trump as bad people to get