An accurate analysis of a biography is not complete with analyzing the content of the book – it must also analyze the content of an author’s character. Tom Wicker had a flourishing career as a journalist for the New York Times, even receiving awards such as the Nieman Fellowship from Harvard (McFadden). An important point to consider is that as much as he was a respected political journalist, he was not a historian. This caused Wicker to write about Eisenhower through a journalism lens, not a historical lens, which added political bias. Wicker even declared that he was “a devout supporter of Eisenhower’s Democratic opponent, Adlai E. Stevenson of Illinois…[he even] raised a little money among [his] colleagues for the eloquent Stevenson” (Wicker 1). This was one of the opening lines of the biography, which set the tone for Wicker’s opposition against Eisenhower throughout the book. His political alignment as a Democrat clouded his objectivity as a
An accurate analysis of a biography is not complete with analyzing the content of the book – it must also analyze the content of an author’s character. Tom Wicker had a flourishing career as a journalist for the New York Times, even receiving awards such as the Nieman Fellowship from Harvard (McFadden). An important point to consider is that as much as he was a respected political journalist, he was not a historian. This caused Wicker to write about Eisenhower through a journalism lens, not a historical lens, which added political bias. Wicker even declared that he was “a devout supporter of Eisenhower’s Democratic opponent, Adlai E. Stevenson of Illinois…[he even] raised a little money among [his] colleagues for the eloquent Stevenson” (Wicker 1). This was one of the opening lines of the biography, which set the tone for Wicker’s opposition against Eisenhower throughout the book. His political alignment as a Democrat clouded his objectivity as a