Electoral College Debate Analysis

The question regarding what actually is the best way of promoting democracy through means of voting has evoked centuries of debates. In the AP Government debate on the Electoral College, the affirmative side calls for a reform in this area and implies the advantage of direct democracy over representative democracy because it better preserves individual political power, and that the Electoral College the US has nowadays can pose a threat to minority rights. The negative side, on the other hand, defends the merit of representative democracy and stresses that it is actually more reliable and much more practical, therefore should be kept unchanged. Regardless of the process of the debate, their positions can potentially make significant influence in American government and politics. With democracy as a strongly upheld value, the American government has strived for individual rights and political powers for its people. Since voting is the more direct way of influencing policies, the way that the Electoral College functions is crucial for the nation, and is a major unique portion of Federalism. During the debate on this crucial issue, the affirmative team did an overall better job; they …show more content…
Their opening statement used statistics for the world series to resemble the process of Electoral College, and this could have been done in a much more efficient and accurate way by using datas directly related to their topic. For their closing statement, they brought up some information and datas that could have been used to strongly support their position; however, they not only missed the chance, but used it in a inappropriate section as well. The affirmative team also made the same mistake, but not as significant. Their use of language and tone showed a lack of confidence and made their arguments sound less persuasive than they actually