Castro clenched the votes of the masses, which were made up of the uneducated and underprivileged inadvertently promising a better quality of life. Another advantage to communism is the lack of competition within the society. There is a level of equality that communism brings. Theoretically, all rewards from a communist labour system are divided equally among the individuals in the society. A communist government treats all individuals equally regardless of financial stability or education. The divide that economic boundaries usually creates is vanished in communist regime; the lack of economic boundaries reduces crime and violence because people are not classified or categorized by their economic class. If individuals agree with social and economic equality, this system effectively rids society of intense competition. There is a lack of competition in wealth and riches, as many of Cuba’s privileged fled as they observed the indistinguishable status quo of all individuals. Soon after Fidel created a policy of shelter for all, dissecting the homes and hotels of the rich and famous (who had exiled) and equally giving them out to people segment by …show more content…
An economy combining aspects of both theories is ideal. A mixed economy allows a “level of private economic freedom in the use of capital, but also allows for governments to interfere in economic activities in order to achieve social aims.” Mixed economies allow private ownership which boosts economic growth, however it also has the authority to control these major corporations socially and economically. A mixed economy can create greater equality by providing a level of economic security to prevent people living in poverty. At the same time, a mixed economy has the advantage of allowing people to enjoy the financial rewards of hard work and entrepreneurship, which would not happen in a communist regime. In the documentary “Cuba’s Secret Side” by Karin Muelluer viewers observa young Cuban doctor GIVE EXAMPLE ABOUT CUBA DOCTORS GETTING PAID V